2011
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glioma cells showing IDH1 mutation cannot be propagated in standard cell culture conditions

Abstract: Background:It has recently been reported by several sources that original (i.e., present in vivo) glioma cell phenotypes or genotypes cannot be maintained in vitro. For example, glioblastoma cell lines presenting EGFR amplification cannot be established.Methods and results:IDH1 sequencing and loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed for 15 surgery samples of astrocytoma and early and late passages of cells derived from those and for 11 archival samples. We were not able to culture tumour cells presenting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their frequent occurrence, glioma xenografts carrying these mutations are very scarce (41,52,53), and in vitro propagation of IDH1-mutated glioma cell lines is challenging (54). Interestingly, and in line with clinical observations, E478 xenografts present with lower proliferation rates than IDHwt counterparts, as established via the Ki67 index, and mice carrying these xenografts have a longer survival time than mice carrying IDHwt xenografts (see Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Despite their frequent occurrence, glioma xenografts carrying these mutations are very scarce (41,52,53), and in vitro propagation of IDH1-mutated glioma cell lines is challenging (54). Interestingly, and in line with clinical observations, E478 xenografts present with lower proliferation rates than IDHwt counterparts, as established via the Ki67 index, and mice carrying these xenografts have a longer survival time than mice carrying IDHwt xenografts (see Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Inasmuch as mutant IDH status is associated with a favorable prognosis in glioma (40), our finding that physiologically relevant doses of NAA and NAAG facilitate GSC growth and differentiation resistance is consistent with the reduction of these metabolites in less aggressive IDH mutant tumors. Despite the prevalence of mutant IDH in oligodendroglioma (41) and proneural GBM (37), the GSCs lines in this study expressed wild-type IDH1 and -2, 3 likely owing to the negative selection of cells with IDH mutations in culture (42). Mutant IDH is hypothesized to drive oncogenesis, in part, by promoting epigenetic dysregulation and the induction of a CpG island methylator phenotype (43); however, why IDH mutations are simultaneously associated with reduced glioma malignancy remains elusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditional IDH1 (R132H) knockin mice with expression in all hematopoietic cells or cells of the myeloid lineage caused an increased number of early hematopoietic progenitors with splenomegaly, anemia, and extramedullary hematopoiesis (42), whereas brain-specific IDH1 (R132H)-conditional knockin mice exhibited hemorrhage and perinatal lethality (43). Like EGFR amplification in primary glioblastomas, IDH1 mutations in secondary glioblastomas are typically lost during culture in vitro (44). This is enigmatic, since selective suppression of endogenous mutant IDH1 expression in a fibrosarcoma cell line with a native IDH1R132C heterozygous mutation significantly inhibits cell proliferation (45).…”
Section: Biologic Consequences Of Idh Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%