Abstract:Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant
brain tumor characterized
by a heterogeneous population of genetically unstable and highly infiltrative
cells that are resistant to chemotherapy. Although substantial efforts
have been invested in the field of anti-GBM drug discovery in the
past decade, success has primarily been confined to the preclinical
level, and clinical studies have often been hampered due to efficacy-,
selectivity-, or physicochemical property-related issues. Thus, expansion
of the list of molec… Show more
“…One of the main challenges for glioblastoma drug development is the design of drug candidates that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which normally requires them to be small and lipophilic. [2,3] A promising approach to circumvent the impediment of the BBB is to use intratumoral injections of highly cytotoxic or immunomodulating drugs directly into the inoperable tumor, which represents the next generation of glioblastoma treatments. Such intratumoral injections are currently in Phase I and II human clinical trials for other drugs including platinum-based drugs, such as cisplatin and oxaliplatin, and injections of T-Vec, drugs used to treat advanced melanoma and a range of other cancers.…”
Two new series of complexes with pyridine‐containing Schiff bases, [VVO(SALIEP)L] and [VVO(Cl‐SALIEP)L] (SALIEP = N‐(salicylideneaminato)‐2‐(2‐aminoethylpyridine; Cl‐SALIEP = N‐(5‐chlorosalicylideneaminato)‐2‐(2‐aminoethylpyridine, L = catecholato(2‐) ligand) were synthesized. Characterization by 1H and 51V NMR and UV‐Vis spectroscopies confirmed that: 1) most complexes form two major geometric isomers in solution, and [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] (DTB = di‐tert‐butylcatecholato(2‐)) forms two isomers that equilibrate in solution; and 2) tert‐butyl substituents was necessary to stabilize the reduced V(IV) species (EPR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry). The pyridine moiety within the Schiff base ligands significantly changed their chemical properties with unsubstituted catecholate ligands compared with the parent HSHED (N‐(salicylideneaminato)‐Nˊ‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1,2‐ethanediamine) Schiff base complexes. Immediate reduction to V(IV) occurred for the unsubstituted‐catecholato V(V) complexes on dissolution in DMSO. By contrast, the pyridine moiety within the Schiff base significantly improved the hydrolytic stability of [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] compared with [VVO(HSHED)(DTB)]. [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] had moderate stability in cell culture media. There was significant cellular uptake of the intact complex by T98g (human glioblastoma) cells and very good anti‐proliferative activity (IC50 6.7 ± 0.9 μM, 72 h), which was ~five‐fold higher compared with the non‐cancerous human cell line, HFF‐1 (IC50 34 ± 10 μM). This made it a potential drug candidate for the treatment of advanced gliomas by intracranial injections.
“…One of the main challenges for glioblastoma drug development is the design of drug candidates that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which normally requires them to be small and lipophilic. [2,3] A promising approach to circumvent the impediment of the BBB is to use intratumoral injections of highly cytotoxic or immunomodulating drugs directly into the inoperable tumor, which represents the next generation of glioblastoma treatments. Such intratumoral injections are currently in Phase I and II human clinical trials for other drugs including platinum-based drugs, such as cisplatin and oxaliplatin, and injections of T-Vec, drugs used to treat advanced melanoma and a range of other cancers.…”
Two new series of complexes with pyridine‐containing Schiff bases, [VVO(SALIEP)L] and [VVO(Cl‐SALIEP)L] (SALIEP = N‐(salicylideneaminato)‐2‐(2‐aminoethylpyridine; Cl‐SALIEP = N‐(5‐chlorosalicylideneaminato)‐2‐(2‐aminoethylpyridine, L = catecholato(2‐) ligand) were synthesized. Characterization by 1H and 51V NMR and UV‐Vis spectroscopies confirmed that: 1) most complexes form two major geometric isomers in solution, and [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] (DTB = di‐tert‐butylcatecholato(2‐)) forms two isomers that equilibrate in solution; and 2) tert‐butyl substituents was necessary to stabilize the reduced V(IV) species (EPR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry). The pyridine moiety within the Schiff base ligands significantly changed their chemical properties with unsubstituted catecholate ligands compared with the parent HSHED (N‐(salicylideneaminato)‐Nˊ‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1,2‐ethanediamine) Schiff base complexes. Immediate reduction to V(IV) occurred for the unsubstituted‐catecholato V(V) complexes on dissolution in DMSO. By contrast, the pyridine moiety within the Schiff base significantly improved the hydrolytic stability of [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] compared with [VVO(HSHED)(DTB)]. [VVO(SALIEP)(DTB)] had moderate stability in cell culture media. There was significant cellular uptake of the intact complex by T98g (human glioblastoma) cells and very good anti‐proliferative activity (IC50 6.7 ± 0.9 μM, 72 h), which was ~five‐fold higher compared with the non‐cancerous human cell line, HFF‐1 (IC50 34 ± 10 μM). This made it a potential drug candidate for the treatment of advanced gliomas by intracranial injections.
“…In addition, drug dose escalation increases the risk of adverse reactions rather than improving therapeutic efficiency. At the same time, the complexity and heterogeneity of GBM are the major factors closely related to multidrug resistance (MDR) in clinical oncology, which hinder the effective tumor suppression of drugs entering intracranial tumors 4a,7 . The development of GBM remains the most severe challenge in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic management due to the deficient accumulation of drugs and drug resistance in intracranial tumor lesions as well as the incomplete resection of tumor tissue.…”
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. The presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) prevents diagnostic and therapeutic drugs from penetrating and working in GBM. In traditional surgical treatment, it is difficult to completely distinguish the boundary between tumor and surrounding normal tissue, resulting in incomplete resection of tumor. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of GBM are very challenging. Several molecular probes and nanoprobes have been reported to successfully penetrate the BBB, selectively target and accumulate in GBM to achieve in situ imaging of brain tumors, thus achieving accurate diagnosis and treatment of orthotopic or non‐orthotopic GBM. This paper reviews the advances of molecular probes and nanoprobes in image‐guided diagnosis and treatment of GBM. The design principle, application, and advantages of each probe are enumerated in detail. Finally, the prospects and potential challenges of probes in the diagnosis and treatment of GBM are discussed with a view to further promote the study and application of novel imaging probes in GBM.
“…Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most commonly diagnosed subtype of gliomas and categorized as a grade 4 astrocytoma by the World Health Organization (WHO), accounting for about 57% of all gliomas and 48% of all primary malignant CNS tumors (Tan et al 2020, Thakur et al 2022. The incidence of GBM increases with advancing age, with a peak incidence occurring at 75 to 84 years of age and a slight predominance in men (Grochans et al 2022).…”
Objective: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor that shows intratumoral heterogeneity at the cellular and molecular level. Activation of programmed death receptor 1(PD-1) interaction with its ligand PD-L1 is a well-known mechanism requisite for immune evasion deployed by malignant tumors including GBM. Herein, we set out to dissect the mechanism explaining the regulation of PD-L1 gene expression in GBM.
Methods:The clinical samples consisted of 37 GBM tissues and 18 normal brain tissues. GBM cell model was treated by microRNA (miRNA) inhibitor, DNA constructs, and siRNAs. Assays of CCK-8 and Transwell insert were employed to assess the survival, migratory and invasive ability of GBM cell model. The immunosuppressive factor production, T cell apoptosis, and T cell cytotoxicity to GBM cells were evaluated in the co-culture system.Results: GBM exhibited more miR-10b-5p abundance than normal at both tissue and cellular level. Suppression of miR-10b-5p weakened the ability of GBM cell model to survive, migrate, and invade, decreased the release of immunosuppressive factors, reduced T cell apoptosis, and strengthened the T cell cytotoxicity to GBM cell model. miR-10b-5p conferred a negative control of TET2 that was downregulated in GBM. The functions of miR-10b-5p on GBM cell aggressiveness and immune evasion were mediated by TET2. TET2 recruited histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 into the PD-L1 promoter region thus inhibiting its transcription.
Conclusion:The study demonstrated the importance of miR-10b-5p-mediated repression of TET2 in PD-L1-driven immune evasion and their potential for immunotherapeutic targeting in GBM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.