1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1979.tb13508.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glibenclamide and Glipizide in Maturity Onset Diabetes

Abstract: The effects of glibenclamide and glipizide on the concentrations of S‐glucose, S‐insulin and S‐lipids and on the 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion were studied in 37 patients with maturity onset diabetes. A double‐blind, cross‐over, double‐dummy technique was used. The fasting S‐insulin concentration was higher during glibenclamide therapy, while the increase in insulin concentration one hour postprandially was stronger during glipizide therapy, supporting the concept that glibenclamide has a more prolonged an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 A further nine articles published in the 1970s reported use of the double dummy trial design. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The introduction of the double dummy trial design in the 1960s Careful reading of these 1970s studies, however, revealed that the Croatian study was not the earliest to report the use of the double dummy trial design. The earliest reports that we have identified so far were two published in 1964 and 1965.…”
Section: Bibliographic Recognition Of the Double Dummy Trial Design Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 A further nine articles published in the 1970s reported use of the double dummy trial design. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The introduction of the double dummy trial design in the 1960s Careful reading of these 1970s studies, however, revealed that the Croatian study was not the earliest to report the use of the double dummy trial design. The earliest reports that we have identified so far were two published in 1964 and 1965.…”
Section: Bibliographic Recognition Of the Double Dummy Trial Design Imentioning
confidence: 99%