2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glenosphere dissociation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the majority of retrievals had no corrosion or only mild corrosion agrees with our hypothesis and the work of Cusick et al, 5 who found mild corrosion on 1 reverse shoulder implant and no corrosion on 4 others. This is a lower incidence than reported for retrieved hip implants, for which corrosion has been found in up to 84% of both metalmetal and ceramic-metal taper interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…That the majority of retrievals had no corrosion or only mild corrosion agrees with our hypothesis and the work of Cusick et al, 5 who found mild corrosion on 1 reverse shoulder implant and no corrosion on 4 others. This is a lower incidence than reported for retrieved hip implants, for which corrosion has been found in up to 84% of both metalmetal and ceramic-metal taper interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Forty-eight (7.2%) of the 664 complications after RSA were due to baseplate failure or glenosphere dissociation 3,6-8,10-14,16-18,23-30, . Surgical approach (superior-lateral), improper technique (i.e., improper engagement of the Morse taper), superior glenosphere tilt, patient age of <70 years, and female sex have all been implicated as risk factors for glenoid failure 150,151 . Scapular notching has been associated with baseplate failure, but has not been confirmed as an independent risk factor for this Fig.…”
Section: Anatomic Tsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tribocorrosion was graded on a scale from 1 to 4 depending on the extent and the magnitude of the damage as described by Goldberg et al [ 9 ] and modified by Cusick and colleagues [ 11 ] ( Table 3 ). This classification is the most commonly used damage scoring system to identify tribocorrosion on retrieved implants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard several different factors are associated with tribocorrosion, including material combination, head size, offset, implantation time, and flexural rigidity [ 7 ]. Whereas multiple retrieval studies regarding hip implants are available, only a small number of retrieval studies for modular shoulder arthroplasty exist [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%