2004
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
303
1
34

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
14
303
1
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have reported that patients with high Gleason scores (≥ 8) had poor prognoses [29], but others found that the Gleason scores had limited prognostic value for prostate cancer patients. Our study suggested that the biopsy Gleason score could predict PFS, but not OS.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Predictors For Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported that patients with high Gleason scores (≥ 8) had poor prognoses [29], but others found that the Gleason scores had limited prognostic value for prostate cancer patients. Our study suggested that the biopsy Gleason score could predict PFS, but not OS.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Predictors For Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human prostatic carcinomas (PCs) are graded by pathologists using the Gleason system (Gleason, 1966), which remains one of the most powerful prognostic indicators in PC (Humphrey, 2004;Young et al, 2000). An important feature of the Gleason grading is that it does not rely on detailed assessment of nuclear morphology, but it assigns numerical grades (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) based upon the architectural patterns of the tumour that are best evaluated at low power magnification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obje metode interpretiraju standardne tkivne rezove obojene hemalaun-eozinom u svjetlosnoj mikroskopiji. Gleasonov sustav bazira se na arhitekturalnim karakteristikama rasta tumora dok metoda SZO-a uz nuklearnu anaplaziju uključuje i sposobnost tumora da formira žlijezde 16 . Dr. Donald F. Gleason, patolog iz Minnesote (SAD), zajedno s članovima Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group objavio je rezultate randomizirane kliničke studije koja je na velikoj skupini od 5.000 pacijenata s karcinomom prostate testirala sustav gradiranja u odnosu na preživljenje 17 .…”
Section: Tip Tumoraunclassified