Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2839462.2839501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gleamy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first occurance is assumed to be the Dangling String (Weiser & Brown, 1996), notifying co-workers about network traffic through a moving string hung from the ceiling. More recent examples are Ambient Rabbits (Mirlacher, Buchner, Förster, Weiss, & Tscheligi, 2009) visualising weather forecast, AwareMirror, augmented mirrors (Fujinami, Kawsar, & Nakajima, 2005) providing personal information during morning bathroom activities, and Gleamy (Cha, Lee, & Nam, 2016), a bedside lamp visualing daily activity. Skog et al (2003) argue ambient displays should not necessarily be physical in nature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first occurance is assumed to be the Dangling String (Weiser & Brown, 1996), notifying co-workers about network traffic through a moving string hung from the ceiling. More recent examples are Ambient Rabbits (Mirlacher, Buchner, Förster, Weiss, & Tscheligi, 2009) visualising weather forecast, AwareMirror, augmented mirrors (Fujinami, Kawsar, & Nakajima, 2005) providing personal information during morning bathroom activities, and Gleamy (Cha, Lee, & Nam, 2016), a bedside lamp visualing daily activity. Skog et al (2003) argue ambient displays should not necessarily be physical in nature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, the mechanisms (Taher, Vidler, & Alexander, 2017) for shape deformation include electromechanical actuation (Iwata, Yano, Nakaizumi, & Kawamura, 2005) (Alexander, Weichel, Hardy, Vidler, & Taher, 2015), pneumatic actuation (Yao et al, 2013) (Goulthorpe, Burry, & Dunlop, 2001), hydraulic actuation (Olwal, Cheng, Follmer, Ishii, & Leithinger, 2012), smart materials (Nakatani, Kajimoto, Sekiguchi, Kawakami, & Tachi, 2003) (Nojima, Ooide, & Kawaguchi, 2013), electromagnetic actuation (Frisken-Gibson, Bach-Y-Rita, Tompkins, & Webster, 1987), and piezoelectric actuation (Kyung et al, 2011). There are also technologies that dynamically control a material's transparency (Cha et al, 2016), which can be used to create the illusion of shape-changing.…”
Section: Ubiquitous Computing and Tangible Bitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensordriven sculpture uses data from a people's chair to suggest when it is time to take a break by encoding it into its shape and movement (see Figure 4.18-center). Similar projects used physical avatars in form of a puppet [Daian et al, 2007], a flower [Haller et al, 2011;Hong et al, 2015] or encoded data into the transparency of a lamp shape [Cha et al, 2016]. The first project that looked into the role of physically dynamic data representations for the exploration and analysis of datasets was EMERGE [Taher et al, 2015]: an interactive bar chart, equipped with plastic rods, RGB Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs), a Microsoft Kinect® and a projector supported fundamental data representation tasks such as filtering or sorting (see Figure 4.18-right).…”
Section: Examples For Physicalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%