2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-0996-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glaucoma-related central visual field deterioration after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane: topographic characteristics and risk factors

Abstract: Background/Objectives To identify risk factors for glaucoma-related central visual field (VF) deterioration after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for epiretinal membrane (ERM). Subjects/Methods A prospective cohort study consisting of cases with or without glaucoma (33 eyes of 33 patients in each group) who underwent vitrectomy with ILM peeling for ERM. Humphrey 10-2 VFs and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness were measured at baseline and about 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sector analysis of TD has been reported to be effective in the evaluation of visual fields in glaucoma. 14,15,[18][19][20] In this study, there were no significant changes in MD and PSD values before and after ptosis surgery. However, in the sector analysis of TD values, while there were no significant changes in inferior TD values, there was a significant improvement in superior TD values.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Sector analysis of TD has been reported to be effective in the evaluation of visual fields in glaucoma. 14,15,[18][19][20] In this study, there were no significant changes in MD and PSD values before and after ptosis surgery. However, in the sector analysis of TD values, while there were no significant changes in inferior TD values, there was a significant improvement in superior TD values.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Nevertheless, the decision of nonintervention to preserve visual function is difficult to make while facing patients with ERM and visual symptoms during 2012 to 2018 before extensive studies on ERM and glaucoma were available. 6,7,17,20,21 Several studies have demonstrated a worsening of visual sensitivity of the macular area after ERM/ILM peeling, especially in the nasal area, which corresponds to the ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer thinning in the temporal region of the macula after surgery in glaucomatous rather than nonglaucomatous eyes. 6,7,20,22 The worsening is more likely to occur in the central field, or in the damaged hemifield, than the normal functioning hemifield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, measuring the true thickness of the GCC layer is critical for monitoring glaucoma progression. The comorbidity of ERM and glaucoma increases the difficulty of using GCC to monitor glaucoma, whereas ERM removal has been shown to increase visual functional deterioration (26,27). The comorbidity of ERM and glaucoma is problematic not only for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma but also for its pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%