2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2016.7493360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glaucoma classification with a fusion of segmentation and image-based features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table III and Table IV discussed performance of the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with different classification setups (Table III) and configuration (Table IV); however to further examine efficacy of our proposed model in comparison to the other existing glaucoma detection and classification methods, we have performed analysis based on secondary resources (reviewing existing methods or allied papers). [49] 84.38 --- [54] 95.50 --- [60] --- [64] 88.00 --- [35] --98.60 - [36] 99.20 -86.00 - [65] ---- [47] 80.00 -95.00 - [48] 97.00 --- [57] 98 --- [39] 94.10 -91.80 - [75] 90.00 --- [40] --92.00 - [33] 100.00 -94.00 - [59] ---- [66] 89.6 (NB) 97.6(AN N) --- [67] 92.00 --- [68] ---- [69] 72.38 --- [70] 79.00 -87.00 - [71] 83.10 --- [62] 93.00 --- [72] 96.67 -100.00 - [73] 91.00 --- [74] 92.00 --- [4] 0.8478 - [55] 88. Observing the results, it can be found that the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with Hybrid feature extraction and SVM (polynomial) with 10-fold cross validation outperforms major existing approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table III and Table IV discussed performance of the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with different classification setups (Table III) and configuration (Table IV); however to further examine efficacy of our proposed model in comparison to the other existing glaucoma detection and classification methods, we have performed analysis based on secondary resources (reviewing existing methods or allied papers). [49] 84.38 --- [54] 95.50 --- [60] --- [64] 88.00 --- [35] --98.60 - [36] 99.20 -86.00 - [65] ---- [47] 80.00 -95.00 - [48] 97.00 --- [57] 98 --- [39] 94.10 -91.80 - [75] 90.00 --- [40] --92.00 - [33] 100.00 -94.00 - [59] ---- [66] 89.6 (NB) 97.6(AN N) --- [67] 92.00 --- [68] ---- [69] 72.38 --- [70] 79.00 -87.00 - [71] 83.10 --- [62] 93.00 --- [72] 96.67 -100.00 - [73] 91.00 --- [74] 92.00 --- [4] 0.8478 - [55] 88. Observing the results, it can be found that the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with Hybrid feature extraction and SVM (polynomial) with 10-fold cross validation outperforms major existing approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can increase the number of patients and analyze the performance. [2] In this study document, the various image processing techniques used for the detection and diagnosis of glaucoma were compiled. The main objective here is to highlight the extensive research conducted in this area and to highlight the seriousness of this disease.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors prefer the use of more than two colour planes usually from RGB colour space. The processing is performed separately, as if different grey level images were available [ 8 , 10 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the cup edge is dictated by vessel bends. For this reason, the majority of approaches presented in the past may not give accurate results when dealing with complex image databases [ 5 , 8 , 10 , 26 28 , 30 34 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 49 , 51 54 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%