2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00647-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition temperature prediction of disordered molecular solids

Abstract: Glass transition temperature, Tg, is the key quantity for assessing morphological stability and molecular ordering of films of organic semiconductors. A reliable prediction of Tg from the chemical structure is, however, challenging, as it is sensitive to both molecular interactions and analysis of the heating or cooling process. By combining a fitting protocol with an automated workflow for forcefield parameterization, we predict Tg with a mean absolute error of ~20 °C for a set of organic compounds with Tg in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DSC traces of p -TPS-DMAC-TRZ ( Figure 6 b) showed a glass transition temperature (T g ) value of 265 °C, which is higher than that of DMAC-TRZ (91 °C [ 33 ]), and no melting transitions, indicating its amorphous nature. This high T g value is an essential feature for materials to be used in OLEDs since it correlates with stable film morphology and thus, a potentially longer operational lifetime of the devices [ 24 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSC traces of p -TPS-DMAC-TRZ ( Figure 6 b) showed a glass transition temperature (T g ) value of 265 °C, which is higher than that of DMAC-TRZ (91 °C [ 33 ]), and no melting transitions, indicating its amorphous nature. This high T g value is an essential feature for materials to be used in OLEDs since it correlates with stable film morphology and thus, a potentially longer operational lifetime of the devices [ 24 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, melting point prediction for structurally diverse compounds is a more challenging task because several factors, such as intermolecular interactions and entropic effects to name a few, significantly influence the melting behavior and are difficult to quantify solely from the molecular structure. Advancements in methodology for predicting melting points over the past several decades have resulted in models that are more accurate and applicable to a wider range of compound types. Currently, methods for melting point prediction can be roughly divided into three categories, namely, group addition, , molecular dynamics, and QSPR. , Group addition is the most straightforward method, but its accuracy and application are severely limited by the scope of pre-defined functional fragments or groups in the molecules. Although melting points predicted from molecular dynamics are generally more accurate and therefore desirable, the calculations are time-consuming and require knowledge of the crystal structures of predicted compounds, which significantly limits the applicability of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon cooling of a rubbery liquid polymer, dynamic properties such as viscosity or relaxation time increase drastically near the glass transition temperature ( T g ) in a super-Arrhenius fashion without any remarkable change in structural properties . Despite enormous experimental and theoretical efforts, the nature of glass transition as well as the question of a precisely defined T g still remain unclear. , In computer simulations, T g is often calculated from characteristic macroscopic properties, e.g., changes in the specific volume, density, or energy. The increase in viscosity, equivalent to the terminal relaxation times, is commonly fitted to a Vogel–Fulcher–Tamann behavior that predicts a divergence at T VFT , typically about 50° below the calorimetric T g . However, the precise value of the observed T g depends on the cooling rate and fitting procedures, which can lead to some ambiguities in comparison with experimental values, , unlike a sharp and distinct change in physical properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precise value of the observed T g depends on the cooling rate and fitting procedures, which can lead to some ambiguities in comparison with experimental values, , unlike a sharp and distinct change in physical properties. Thus, reliable predictions of T g are indeed challenging. ,,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation