1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-005x(97)80020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition temperature of proteins. Calculation based on the additive contribution method and experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…VI and VII). Within the a w range investigated, and in agreement with the literature [12,14,15], whey proteins and caseins were more hygroscopic than the other powders, except for hydrolyzed skim milk. One interesting finding of this study relates to the values of ∆Cp obtained for caseins and whey proteins (0.37 and 0.13 J·g·°C -1 at 0.22 a w , respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VI and VII). Within the a w range investigated, and in agreement with the literature [12,14,15], whey proteins and caseins were more hygroscopic than the other powders, except for hydrolyzed skim milk. One interesting finding of this study relates to the values of ∆Cp obtained for caseins and whey proteins (0.37 and 0.13 J·g·°C -1 at 0.22 a w , respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…One interesting finding of this study relates to the values of ∆Cp obtained for caseins and whey proteins (0.37 and 0.13 J·g·°C -1 at 0.22 a w , respectively). These differences can be explained both by their composition in amino acids and by their degree of organization [14]. Table VIII gives T g and ∆Cp values for the different constituent types at 0.0 a w , given in the literature or linearly extrapolated from the results obtained in this study From these results, it is possible to consider the behavior of the different powders during drying (stickiness) and storage (caking) according to the range of variations in the parameters [T -T g ] (T corresponding to the temperature of the powder) and ∆Cp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additive group-contribution technique is only applicable for calculation of T g values of dry biopolymers when the contribution of each structural unit of a biopolymer does not depend upon its surroundings and the T g of a biopolymer reflects its chemical structure rather than its physical structure [19]. Because both denaturation of proteins and gelatinization of starch do not affect the chemical composition of the biopolymers, the T g values of native biopolymers are presumably close to those of denatured and gelatinized biopolymers.…”
Section: Composition-t G Relationships In Food Macromoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta equação tem sido aplicada por diversos autores (ARVANITOYANNIS et al, 1993;KALICHEVSKY et al, 1993;SCHUCK et al, 2005b). Para a realização dos cálculos foram utilizados os valores de Tg e ΔCp de cada componente presente nos compostos lácteos: lactose Tg 98 ºC, ΔCp 0,38 J/kg· ºC (SENOUSSI et al, 1995); caseína Tg 132 ºC, ΔCp 0,26 J/kg ºC (MATVEEV et al, 1997); proteínas do soro Tg 127 ºC, ΔCp 0,09 J/kg·ºC (KALICHEVSKY et al, 1993;MATVEEV et al, 1997;MAUER et al, 2000).…”
Section: Cálculo Da Temperatura De Transição Vítreaunclassified