2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2390705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition in fullerenes: Mode-coupling theory predictions

Abstract: We report idealized mode-coupling theory results for the glass transition of ensembles of model fullerenes interacting via phenomenological two-body potentials. Transition lines are found for C60, C70 and C96 in the temperature-density plane. We argue that the observed glass-transition behavior is indicative of kinetic arrest that is strongly driven by the inter-particle attraction in addition to excluded-volume repulsion. In this respect, these systems differ from most standard glass-forming liquids. They fea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
8
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the non-ergodicity factors, also shown in the same figure, are hardly affected by the density variation, and infact run almost superimposed on top of each other, thus predicting a glassy phase all along the isotherm T = 1200 K. These evidences support the theoretical observation that MCT predictions for glasses characterized by short-range attractions, are barely sensitive to the low-k behavior of the structure factor [21]. The non-zero ergodicity factors displayed in Figure 2 would allow us to shift to lower densities the T = 1200 K MCT vitrification threshold, causing a net bending of the glass transition line, even more pronounced than that predicted in ref [19]. Although this feature would indicate an enhancement of the attraction-driven properties of the glass phase, the tendency to phase separate of our sample detected during MD simulations prompts us to some caution as far as any definite conclusion about this point is concerned.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, the non-ergodicity factors, also shown in the same figure, are hardly affected by the density variation, and infact run almost superimposed on top of each other, thus predicting a glassy phase all along the isotherm T = 1200 K. These evidences support the theoretical observation that MCT predictions for glasses characterized by short-range attractions, are barely sensitive to the low-k behavior of the structure factor [21]. The non-zero ergodicity factors displayed in Figure 2 would allow us to shift to lower densities the T = 1200 K MCT vitrification threshold, causing a net bending of the glass transition line, even more pronounced than that predicted in ref [19]. Although this feature would indicate an enhancement of the attraction-driven properties of the glass phase, the tendency to phase separate of our sample detected during MD simulations prompts us to some caution as far as any definite conclusion about this point is concerned.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…On the whole, we judge the agreement between theory and simulations quite satisfactory, especially if we take into account that all data recorded in Figure 7 have been obtained by pushing the integral equation scheme toward "extreme conditions", as far as the regime in which such tools are known to give the best performances is concerned. Figures 5 and 7 document the good agreement between present simulation results, our thoretical predictions, and those obtained by Greenall and Voigtmann [19], equally from the point of view of MCT transition threshold, and at the level of input structure factor calculations. Our evidences indirectly support the conclusions drawn in ref [19] that, in the framework provided by the modecoupling theory, and in the thermodynamic region T 3000 K, the attractive part of the Girifalco potential is short-range enough to begin to influence the approach to the structural arrest of the system.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations