1971
DOI: 10.1021/j100677a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition in amorphous water. Application of the measurements to problems arising in cryobiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained with dead stems killed by plunging a sample at room temperature into liquid nitrogen. The liquid water content of the stem is a weak function of temperature between -25 and -55 C. However, beginning at -55 C a stronger temperature dependence is apparent which correlates with phase transitions reported by Rasmussen and MacKenzie (23,26 In the present experiments there is clear evidence for further partitioning of the water since both T, and T9 are biphasic. The isolated tissues also had the biphasic relaxation characteristics, thereby reducing the possibility that the origin of the biphasic characteristics is two different stem tissues.…”
Section: Low Temperature Nmr Of Stemssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar results were obtained with dead stems killed by plunging a sample at room temperature into liquid nitrogen. The liquid water content of the stem is a weak function of temperature between -25 and -55 C. However, beginning at -55 C a stronger temperature dependence is apparent which correlates with phase transitions reported by Rasmussen and MacKenzie (23,26 In the present experiments there is clear evidence for further partitioning of the water since both T, and T9 are biphasic. The isolated tissues also had the biphasic relaxation characteristics, thereby reducing the possibility that the origin of the biphasic characteristics is two different stem tissues.…”
Section: Low Temperature Nmr Of Stemssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The glass transition temperature of water was determined by extrapolation of data for the concentration dependence of T g to the zero content of the substance dissolved. However, the values of T g obtained in these investigations cover a wide temperature range, from values comparable with the results of direct measurements, 136 ± 1 K [7,8] , to those that exceed them considerably, 160-165 K [9]. An analysis of the concentration dependences of T g for rapidly quenched aqueous solutions of polyhydric alcohols in a wide concentration range [10] with allowance for the data obtained for hyperquenched droplets in the range of low values of the dissolved substance content [11] has shown that such an extrapolation does not take into account possible anomalies in the behavior of the plots of T g versus concentration, which are connected with the structural peculiarities of water and may lead to considerable errors in determining the glass transition temperature of pure water.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Recently, it was reported that glass transition of amorphous ice in hydrogel prepared from poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) was observed at 136° Κ by dynamic mechanical analysis (27). As the reported T^ is close to that of pure water which is obtained by calorimetric measure ments (26,28), amorphous ice in PHEMA hydrogel scarcely interacts with PHEMA in contrast to the water-polysaccharide systems.…”
Section: Molecular Motion In Regions II and Iiimentioning
confidence: 93%