2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7478-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition improvement in epoxy/graphene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The T g ∞ of the 0.5 wt % GO‐modified system is significantly higher than that of the neat epoxy, being observed an increment of 16.5 °C. Similar increases in the T g ∞ were observed for the nanocomposites produced with an epoxy and different types of modified graphene . This increase can be ascribed to the filler effect which broaden the segmental motion range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The T g ∞ of the 0.5 wt % GO‐modified system is significantly higher than that of the neat epoxy, being observed an increment of 16.5 °C. Similar increases in the T g ∞ were observed for the nanocomposites produced with an epoxy and different types of modified graphene . This increase can be ascribed to the filler effect which broaden the segmental motion range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In this study, improvements in the mechanical and thermal properties of PU/CNT composites have been observed: T g increased by 20 C, and the elastic modulus increased by 47% after adding a small amount of MWCNT-ox to the nanocomposites (0.5 wt %). Furthermore, the oxidized nanotubes are better dispersed in the matrix, as characterized by optical and electron microscopies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Nanoparticle dispersion usually imposes a challenge for obtaining actual nanodielectric systems, where the nanoparticles, due to their large specific surface area and surface tension forces, tend to agglomerate, producing a sub-microcomposites [11,12]. Many researchers have tried to overcome this by treating the nanofiller with matrix-compatible functionalities [13][14][15][16][17]. However, this treatment brings other parameters into play, such as changing the particle surface chemistry and water absorption, and thus, complicates the analysis of the influence of particle dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%