2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-008-0605-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass microneedles for force measurements: a finite-element analysis model

Abstract: Changes in developed force (0.1-3.0 μN) observed during contraction of single myofibrils in response to rapidly changing calcium concentrations can be measured using glass microneedles. These microneedles are calibrated for stiffness and deflect on response to developed myofibril force. The precision and accuracy of kinetic measurements are highly dependent on the structural and mechanical characteristics of the microneedles, which are generally assumed to have a linear forcedeflection relationship. We present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The force probe had a tip diameter of ϳ10 m that tapered little along a 1-mm length (2). The force probes were calibrated by measuring the deflection of the probe with a nano-machined cantilever of known stiffness (a generous gift from Gerald Pollack; Ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force probe had a tip diameter of ϳ10 m that tapered little along a 1-mm length (2). The force probes were calibrated by measuring the deflection of the probe with a nano-machined cantilever of known stiffness (a generous gift from Gerald Pollack; Ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters of the circular cross-sectional area of the portion of the cone inside the myofibril are normally bellow ~0.5–0.7 μm, while its tip is under 0.2 μm. The calibration of the micro-needles also followed a protocol established earlier in our laboratory7 and of others25. The needles were pierced externally adjacent to Z-lines in the case of sarcomeres (Figure 4D and Movie 1 suppl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration of the microneedle was performed by the cross-bending method (Ayittey et al 2009), using pairs of cantilevers of stiffness varying between 22 and 348 nm mm 21 , similar to those used previously in our laboratory for force measurements (Rassier 2008). The cantilevers were produced with nanofabrication techniques and were pre-calibrated before use (Fauver et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%