1992
DOI: 10.1080/13642819208217915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass formation in the Cu–Ti–Zr system and its associated binary systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Ptbased solid solution counterparts, the Pt 3 Ni−M interface effects were expected to be small for M = Au, Ag, Cu, Rh, and Ni because they have the same crystal structure (fcc) and only small differences in electron distribution at the interface. 19 In contrast, for M = Fe, which has a body-centered-cubic (bcc) structure and a significantly different electron distribution due in large part to its different coordination environment, the deformation induced by the lattice mismatch [bcc(110) vs fcc(111)] at the interface should result in a higher interface energy, 20 which should hamper the recovery growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Ptbased solid solution counterparts, the Pt 3 Ni−M interface effects were expected to be small for M = Au, Ag, Cu, Rh, and Ni because they have the same crystal structure (fcc) and only small differences in electron distribution at the interface. 19 In contrast, for M = Fe, which has a body-centered-cubic (bcc) structure and a significantly different electron distribution due in large part to its different coordination environment, the deformation induced by the lattice mismatch [bcc(110) vs fcc(111)] at the interface should result in a higher interface energy, 20 which should hamper the recovery growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 For theoretical discussion of the crystallization of Ni 80 B 20 glass, we have constructed the free-energy diagram of the Ni-B system using the semiempirical model developed by Miedema and co-workers 7,8 and López, Alonso, and Gallego. 9 This approach is a combination of classical elasticity theory 10 and Miedema's model for the heat of formation of alloys, 11 and has successfully been used to predict the glass formation ranges of binary 7-9,12-15 and ternary 16,17 transition-metal alloys, and of binary alloys composed of a transition metal and a nontransition element. 18 The advantage of this treatment lies in its explicit use of the factors that have been recognized empirically as being most closely correlated with glass forming ability: valence, electronegativity, crystal structure, and atomic size mismatch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%