2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass formation and crystallization behavior in Mg65Cu25Y10−xGdx (x=0, 5 and 10) alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the extent of crystallization, it has been shown that these crystallites maintained a relatively constant size. [29] The nature of the crystals (Mg 2 Cu and Cu 2 Gd) was confirmed by XRD and is in agreement with the results obtained by Men et al [30] The presence of both sphere-shaped and rod-shaped particles in the Mg 65 Cu 25 Gd 10 BMG during crystallization is expected to affect the value of F max vol in Relation [2]. However, this possible variation is particularly difficult to estimate quantitatively, and it is the reason why predicted reinforcement factors as a function of F vol have been drawn for various values of F max vol in Figure 10.…”
Section: Quantification Of the Reinforcement Due To Partial Crystasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Whatever the extent of crystallization, it has been shown that these crystallites maintained a relatively constant size. [29] The nature of the crystals (Mg 2 Cu and Cu 2 Gd) was confirmed by XRD and is in agreement with the results obtained by Men et al [30] The presence of both sphere-shaped and rod-shaped particles in the Mg 65 Cu 25 Gd 10 BMG during crystallization is expected to affect the value of F max vol in Relation [2]. However, this possible variation is particularly difficult to estimate quantitatively, and it is the reason why predicted reinforcement factors as a function of F vol have been drawn for various values of F max vol in Figure 10.…”
Section: Quantification Of the Reinforcement Due To Partial Crystasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Stages II and III were hardly noticeable on the isochronal [10] and isothermal [5] DSC traces. This indicates that the energy difference between the products of the later stages is small, whereas the structural difference is prominent.…”
Section: A Transformation Stagesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[1] Among the Mg-Ln-TM (Ln = lanthanide metal, and TM = Ni, Cu, or Zn) alloys, Mg 65 Cu 25 Y 10 has been reported to have very good glass forming ability (GFA) with a critical casting thickness around 5 mm and a temperature interval DT X of 69 K. [2] GFA could be further improved by replacing Cu partially with noble metal atoms [3] or Zn, [4] or replacing Y with rare-earth (RE) atoms. [5,6] The best Mg-based glass formers have the general composition of Mg65-TM25-Ln10. Study of this system also has academic significance because these ternary alloys are simpler than the quinary Zr-based BMGs, and the atomic packing is quite different because of the presence of large RE atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the combined effects of a large difference in atomic size between Ag and the constituting elements and the larger mixing enthalpy of Ag-Mg and Ag-Y than those of Cu, the addition of Ag would contribute to increase the atomic packing density of the liquid structure and GFA. Men et al [7] also investigated the effect of substitution of Y in the Mg 65 Cu 25 Y 10 alloy with Gd on the GFA and crystallization behavior. Due to the difference in electronic configuration between Y (4d 1 5s 2 ) and Gd (4f 7 5d 1 6s 2 ), it results in a certain change of the short-range order in the supercooled liquid of Mg-Cu-Y-Gd alloys and shows a higher GFA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%