1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1986.tb02578.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix: the present state of our knowledge

Abstract: The assessment of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix is a major preoccupation of diagnostic histopathologists and this can overshadow the recognition of significant abnormalities affecting the adjacent endocervical glands. This review gives an account of recent advances in our knowledge of the histology and histochemistry of endocervical glands. The review of benign lesions concentrates on those that continue to cause diagnostic difficulty. Adenocarcinoma in situ, lesser degrees of possibly pre-malignant c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The extent of these areas was not stipulated by the authors. While we certainly do not deny the existence of glandular atypias of lesser grade than adenocarcinoma in situ, we-have not been able to confirm such atypia commonly occurring adjacent to areas of adenocarcinoma in situ, which usually distinctly abut on adjacent histologically normal glands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The extent of these areas was not stipulated by the authors. While we certainly do not deny the existence of glandular atypias of lesser grade than adenocarcinoma in situ, we-have not been able to confirm such atypia commonly occurring adjacent to areas of adenocarcinoma in situ, which usually distinctly abut on adjacent histologically normal glands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete agreement on the diagnosis of ACIS was reached in 96 patients (91%), according to the criteria of Brown and Wells. The criteria of Brown and Wells take architectural (glandular irregularity and complexity) and cytological criteria (nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, pseudostratification of nuclei, increased or abnormal mitoses) into account (Wells and Brown, 1986). The three pathologists reached no consensus on the diagnosis of ACIS in nine patients, and these patients were excluded.…”
Section: Glandular Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The potential for mistaking tubal metaplasia for adenocarcinoma is well described. 6,10,[12][13][14][15] In the experience of Novotny et al, 12 tubal metaplasia was the most common entity misinterpreted as AIS on cervical smears. When considering the possibility of tubal metaplasia vs. adenocarcinoma on cytologic material, identification of cilia is regarded as a valuable feature in support of a benign diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%