2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GLANCE (GLare ANnual Classes Evaluation): An approach for a simplified spatial glare evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, the use of vertical illuminances to control dynamic glazing to were thoroughly studied by Giovannini et al [42,51]. In this study, vertical illuminance values for all four occupants (height = 120 cm, side view directions, perpendicular to the window) were simulated in Radiance using the three-phase method.…”
Section: Glarementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, the use of vertical illuminances to control dynamic glazing to were thoroughly studied by Giovannini et al [42,51]. In this study, vertical illuminance values for all four occupants (height = 120 cm, side view directions, perpendicular to the window) were simulated in Radiance using the three-phase method.…”
Section: Glarementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the external surfaces, the outdoor temperature was considered as well as total radiative gain including direct and diffuse radiation received on the external surface and longwave radiative heat exchange to the surrounding buildings and sky. For internal surfaces, the connection to the adjacent rooms was assumed glazing to minimize glare and the relevant thresholds that could be used were also studied by Giovannini et al [42,51].…”
Section: Appendix A2 the Radiative Heat Exchange Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disability glare is wellestablished in literature whereas discomfort glare is not fully understood [34]. Discomfort glare depends on individual characteristics according to gender, age, fatigue status, light sensitivity, mood [64,65] and diseases, such as glaucoma [66]. Therefore the numerous variables to consider and the lack of standardized measurement makes evaluation of discomfort glare complex [67].…”
Section: Visual Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new set of 'dynamic' daylight metrics have been defined, such as the Annual Light Exposure ALE [46][47], the Daylight Autonomy DA [48], the spatial Daylight Autonomy sDA 300,50% and the Annual Sunlight Exposure ASE 250,1000 [49], the Useful Daylight Illuminance UDI [50], and the Daylight Glare Probability DGP [51]. Besides DGP, also the vertical illuminance at eye-level is used as a proxy for glare analyses [52]. It is worth stressing that above metrics, except ALE, are defined based on 'thresholds', as they represent the percent of occupied annual time when illuminance lies in a certain range.…”
Section: Daylight Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%