GLAMbox: A Python toolbox for investigating the association between gaze allocation and decision behaviour

Abstract

Recent empirical findings have indicated that gaze allocation plays a crucial role in simple decision behaviour. Many of these findings point towards an influence of gaze allocation onto the speed of evidence accumulation in an accumulation-to-bound decision process (resulting in generally higher choice probabilities for items that have been looked at longer). Further, researchers have shown that the strength of the association between gaze and choice behaviour is highly variable between individuals, encouraging future work to study this association on the individual level. However, only few decision models exist that easily allow studying the gaze-choice association on the individual level, due to the high cost of developing and implementing them. The model space is particularly scarce for choice sets with more than two choice alternatives. Here, we present GLAMbox, a Python-based toolbox that is built upon PyMC3 and allows the easy application of the gaze-weighted linear accumulator model (GLAM) to experimental choice data. The GLAM assumes gaze-dependent evidence accumulation in a linear stochastic race that extends to decision scenarios with many choice alternatives. GLAMbox enables Bayesian parameter estimation of the GLAM for individual, pooled or hierarchical models, provides an easy-to-use interface to predict choice behaviour and visualize choice data, and benefits from all of PyMC3's Bayesian statistical modeling functionality. Further documentation, resources and the toolbox itself are available at https://github.com/glamlab/glambox.A plethora of empirical findings has established an association between gaze allocation and decision behaviour on the group-level. For example, in value-based decision making, it was repeatedly shown that longer gaze towards one option is associated with a higher choice probability for that option (

To covet what we see: Autistic traits modulate the relationship between looking and choosing

“…Extending recent reports (Smith & Krajbich, 2018), we found substantial individual differences in the relationship between gaze and choice behavior. This finding emphasises the importance of modeling these individual differences, in line with recent proposals (Molter, Thomas, Heekeren, & Mohr, 2019). Critically, we found that AQ predicted a weaker relationship between gaze and choice behavior.…”

A Neural Pathway for Nonreinforced Preference Change

“…The aDDM is based on the extensively studied drift diffusion model [33,34] and describes how a relative decision value evolves over time, and crucially, how it is biased by overt attention such that ultimately, one item is valued more highly and preferred over another. The approach has influenced a number of groups [35][36][37], but it should be noted that the locus of attention in the model is determined by overt attention (i.e., gaze position) and not by controlling for covert attention, which might sometimes be deployed elsewhere [38]. Whether or not manipulations of covert attention influence preference similarly to manipulations of overt attention is an important open question.…”

Uncovering the Computational Mechanisms Underlying Many-Alternative Choice

“…The GLAM (Thomas et al, 2019;Molter et al, 2019) assumes that choices are driven by the accumulation of noisy evidence in favor of each available choice alternative i. A choice is determined by the first accumulator that reaches a common pre-defined decision boundary b, which we set to 1.…”