1998
DOI: 10.1006/qres.1998.1962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacioisostasy and Lake-Level Change at Moosehead Lake, Maine

Abstract: Reconstructions of glacioisostatic rebound based on relative sea level in Maine and adjacent Canada do not agree well with existing geophysical models. In order to understand these discrepancies better, we investigated the lake-level history of 40-km-long Moosehead Lake in northwestern Maine. Glacioisostasy has affected the level of Moosehead Lake since deglaciation ca. 12,500 14C yr B.P. Lowstand features at the southeastern end and an abandoned outlet at the northwestern end of the lake indicate that the lak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate compares favourably with other estimates for the west coast of Newfoundland based on salt-marsh and tidegauge data (50 km per ka; Daly, 2002) and the raised marine shell record (45 km per ka; Liverman, 1994), although the latter was predicated on forebulge migration between 13 000 and 7000 14 C BP (Liverman, 1994). This rate is also consistent with the rate of forebulge migration calculated between Moosehead Lake (Maine) and Québec City (Balco et al, 1998), but is somewhat lower than the 70-110 km per ka rate estimated for the Gulf of Maine (Barnhardt et al, 1995).…”
Section: Forebulge Migrationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This rate compares favourably with other estimates for the west coast of Newfoundland based on salt-marsh and tidegauge data (50 km per ka; Daly, 2002) and the raised marine shell record (45 km per ka; Liverman, 1994), although the latter was predicated on forebulge migration between 13 000 and 7000 14 C BP (Liverman, 1994). This rate is also consistent with the rate of forebulge migration calculated between Moosehead Lake (Maine) and Québec City (Balco et al, 1998), but is somewhat lower than the 70-110 km per ka rate estimated for the Gulf of Maine (Barnhardt et al, 1995).…”
Section: Forebulge Migrationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This approach enables continuous reconstructions of shoreline advances and retreats through time that at least partly reflect changing hydroclimate (Digerfeldt, 1986). Factors such as isostasy and tectonics can influence large lakes (Balco et al, 1997(Balco et al, , 1998 but operate on scales greater than the small ponds that have been used to reconstruct regional hydrologic changes (Newby et al, 2014). Groundwater flow directly controls the water levels in many small ponds and lakes (Almendinger, 1993;Winter, 1999), but annual changes in precipitation and evaporation have strong regional impacts (Weider and Boutt, 2010).…”
Section: Lake Level Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively large lakes, complicated by processes such as isostatic adjustment (e.g. Yu and Andrews, 1994;Balco et al, 1998) were not included, nor were complex sites where ecological or local hydrological processes may explain the record (e.g. Delcourt et al, 1983;Thorson and Webb, 1991).…”
Section: Lake-level Datamentioning
confidence: 99%