2021
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2021.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacier–plume or glacier–fjord circulation models? A 2-D comparison for Hansbreen–Hansbukta system, Svalbard

Abstract: Up to 30% of the current tidewater mass loss in Svalbard corresponds to frontal ablation through submarine melting and calving. We developed two-dimensional (2-D) glacier–line–plume and glacier–fjord circulation coupled models, both including subglacial discharge, submarine melting and iceberg calving, to simulate Hansbreen–Hansbukta system, SW Svalbard. We ran both models for 20 weeks, throughout April–August 2010, using different scenarios of subglacial discharge and crevasse water depth. Both models showed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these in situ ice flow velocity datasets can be used for tuning numerical models of glacier dynamics, e.g. modelling of flow of a grounded calving glacier (Vieli et al, 2000), developing glacier-plume and glacier-fjord circulation coupled models to simulate a glacier-ocean system (De Andrés et al, 2021), numerical simulation of the ice flow velocity in the future (e.g. Ai et al, 2019a), and changes of strain rate between neighbouring stakes (Ai et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these in situ ice flow velocity datasets can be used for tuning numerical models of glacier dynamics, e.g. modelling of flow of a grounded calving glacier (Vieli et al, 2000), developing glacier-plume and glacier-fjord circulation coupled models to simulate a glacier-ocean system (De Andrés et al, 2021), numerical simulation of the ice flow velocity in the future (e.g. Ai et al, 2019a), and changes of strain rate between neighbouring stakes (Ai et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result is in accordance with the finding of O’Leary and Christoffersen (2013) and De Andrés et al. (2018, 2021) that submarine melting might be a relevant driver of frontal retreat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varied settings of study sites allow for the tracking and identification of GMW and other water masses (Straneo et al, 2011;Chauché et al, 2014). Additionally, this sizable dataset can be used as a tool for better understanding the general hydrodynamics and thermodynamics of glacial bays and fjords and may be employed for the validation of coupled glacier-ocean modelling (Cowton et al, 2015;De Andrés et al, 2021;Bertino and Holland, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%