2018
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2018.1445663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacial lake changes and outburst flood hazard in Chandra basin, North-Western Indian Himalaya

Abstract: Climatic change-induced glacier recession has been accompanied by formation and growth of proglacial lakes in the Himalayan region, which pose an emerging significant threat to the downstream communities/ settlements in the form of outburst floods. To understand spatiotemporal evolution patterns, sources and driving mechanism of formation and expansion of glacial lakes, a temporal inventory of glacial lakes (area > 2000 m 2 ) in Chandra basin has been developed from 2000 to 2014 using IRS LISS-III images. From… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous work has mapped glacial lake change across individual basins e.g. 22,23 or regions e.g. [24][25][26][27][28] , no global assessment has investigated glacial lake occurrence or evolution.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous work has mapped glacial lake change across individual basins e.g. 22,23 or regions e.g. [24][25][26][27][28] , no global assessment has investigated glacial lake occurrence or evolution.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly formed glacial lakes, including supra glacial lakes, were greater in number than the lakes that have disappeared over time. Lake expansion is not limited to the North-Western Himalayas, the phenomenon has also been witnessed in other parts of the Himalayan region and has been well documented in the scholarly literature, for example Central Himalayas have shown an expansion rate of 24% [90], Nepal 25% [19], Namco basin 16.7% [91], Koshi basin 31.5% [53], Entire Third Pole 23% [28], Chandra basin 41.41% [92] and Nepal and Bhutan 20-60% [68]. The classification of glacial lakes becomes problematic when there are several studies that classify/categorize lakes differently based on certain characteristics and no common consensus is developed to standardise a selection criterion and overcome such a problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar exercise was conducted by Frey et al (2010) on the Swiss Alps where the three-level approach was applied to historical data to allow a comparison with the present situation. In this study, we considered the Gepang Gath Glacier, where a proglacial lake had formed during in the 1970s (Prakash and Nagarajan, 2018). The bed topography of Gepang Gath Glacier was derived from the icethickness distribution obtained from the GlabTop2_IITB model simulations based on the glacier boundary of the year 2000 and the archived historical DEM (i.e., SRTM 30 m) captured during February 2000.…”
Section: Validation Exercise On Anticipation Of Current Glacial Lake mentioning
confidence: 99%