2019
DOI: 10.2475/04.2019.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacial geology and cosmogenic-nuclide exposure ages from the Tucker Glacier - Whitehall Glacier confluence, northern Victoria Land, Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A SLE value of < 4.6 m places our estimate between those modelled by Bentley et al (2010) (1.4 to 2 m) and Bassett et al (2007) (13.1 to 14.1 m). Using the estimate based on all sites with the exception of the Lassiter Coast data, the minimum SLE estimate of < 1.5 m is consistent with the lower end of published SLEs for the sector.…”
Section: Sea Level Contributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A SLE value of < 4.6 m places our estimate between those modelled by Bentley et al (2010) (1.4 to 2 m) and Bassett et al (2007) (13.1 to 14.1 m). Using the estimate based on all sites with the exception of the Lassiter Coast data, the minimum SLE estimate of < 1.5 m is consistent with the lower end of published SLEs for the sector.…”
Section: Sea Level Contributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Whitehouse et al, 2017). Consequently, estimates based on ice models constrained by field evidence (Le Brocq et al, 2011) and by relative sea level records and earth viscosity models (Bassett et al, 2007) for the contribution of the sector to global sea level since deglaciation began vary by an order of magnitude, from 1.4 to 14.1 m, respectively. The lack of geological evidence for LGM thickening is also manifest in a misfit between presentday geodetic uplift rate measurements in southern Palmer Land and predicted uplift rates from a glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model (Wolstencroft et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only way elevated in situ 14 C concentrations could be explained is with an unlikely geomorphic scenario in which the samples were exposed at much higher elevations for a significant period of time before being rapidly transported to their sampling location. This phenomenon was described by Balco et al (2016) and potentially observed by Balco et al (2019). Subsequent elevated in situ 14 C concentrations measured from bedrock samples led us to rule out this scenario as the sole source of the observed elevated in situ 14 C concentrations, and we began to explore other explanations.…”
Section: Initial Anomalous 14 C Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The additional measurements left two potential explanations for the elevated concentrations: unidentified systematic measurement issues or contamination of sample material. Repeat measurements of the quartz interlaboratory comparison material CRONUS-A (Jull et al, 2015;Goehring et al, 2019) and other samples allowed us to rule out systematic measurement issues and conclude that there must be an unidentified source of 14 C contamination. The measurements presented in Figs.…”
Section: Initial Anomalous 14 C Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation