2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1012034608908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The effect of killer strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the growth of sensitive strains during must fermentation was studied by using a new method to monitor yeast populations. The capability of killer yeast strains to eliminate sensitive strains depends on the initial proportion of killer yeasts, the susceptibility of sensitive strains, and the treatment of the must. In sterile filtered must, an initial proportion of 2-6% of killer yeasts was responsible for protracted fermentation and suppression of isog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But this time was reduced again in cold-settled non-filtered must, where EX1180-11C4 disappeared after just 1 day ( Figure 1D ). A plausible explanation for this behavior is the presence of grape particles through the fermentation, which might adsorb and inactivate the toxin produced by T. delbrueckii , as it was previously shown for toxins produced by S. cerevisiae ( Pérez et al, 2001 ). The S. cerevisiae EX85 strain also dominated the must fermentation when initially combined with 90% of the non-killer T. delbrueckii EX1180-2K - , although this latter strain remained at above 40% for 7 days in filtered must fermentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But this time was reduced again in cold-settled non-filtered must, where EX1180-11C4 disappeared after just 1 day ( Figure 1D ). A plausible explanation for this behavior is the presence of grape particles through the fermentation, which might adsorb and inactivate the toxin produced by T. delbrueckii , as it was previously shown for toxins produced by S. cerevisiae ( Pérez et al, 2001 ). The S. cerevisiae EX85 strain also dominated the must fermentation when initially combined with 90% of the non-killer T. delbrueckii EX1180-2K - , although this latter strain remained at above 40% for 7 days in filtered must fermentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In particular therefore, the results showing that the T. delbrueckii Kbarr-1 strain dominated the low-turbidity (<100 NTU) sterile must fermentation when co-inoculated in a 90% initial proportion with 10% of S. cerevisiae wine strains are reliable. This initial proportion was much greater than that required for the S. cerevisiae killer K2 strain to dominate must fermentation ( Pérez et al, 2001 ), probably because of the faster growth and fermentation rates of S. cerevisiae relative to T. delbrueckii ( Mauricio et al, 1998 ). Increased must turbidity to values that are frequent in industrial wineries (100–250 NTU) had no relevant inhibitory effect on this T. delbrueckii Kbarr-1 domination, and, in particular, much less than the inhibitory effect that had been found previously using S. cerevisiae killer-K2 strains ( Pérez et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These infected cells are often detected in wine fermentation processes whereby killer yeasts contaminate starter cultures, killing the microbiological fermenting agents. Ratios as low as one killer yeast for every hundred sensitive yeasts was reported to eliminate the starter culture population within 24 h [4][5][6]. Stuck fermentations, which are characterized by high concentrations of acetaldehyde and lactic acid, are often a consequence and are typical of a very distasteful wine product [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%