Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005886709040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5b) shows example (5a) with a noun phrase in the object position rather than an object clitic for comparison. The ezafe in Farsi is an unstressed vowel that occurs when a noun is modified and follows the noun (Ghomeshi, 1997).…”
Section: Possessive and Object Cliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5b) shows example (5a) with a noun phrase in the object position rather than an object clitic for comparison. The ezafe in Farsi is an unstressed vowel that occurs when a noun is modified and follows the noun (Ghomeshi, 1997).…”
Section: Possessive and Object Cliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Amin had said that the students brought the tables." 5 The Ezafe vowel -e (usually pronounced -ye after vowels) syntactically links some elements with their modifiers in Persian (for analyses of the Ezafe construction, see e.g., Samiian 1994, Ghomeshi 1997a, Fig. 10: The utterance aemín goft-é-bud ke šagerd-á miz-á-ro avórd-aen "Amin had said that the students brought the tables.…”
Section: + H*h L + H* Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I do not compare different varieties of Persian in this paper, I do not make use of this terminology here. 3 dâshtan has an additional, unrelated use as a marker of progressive aspect (Taleghani 2010 Several analyses exist of the ezâfe construction, ranging from treating it as a marker of Case on +N elements (Samiian 1994;Larson and Samiian 2020), a marker of agreement triggered after roll-up movement (Kahnemuyipour 2014), and a linker affixed to heads at PF (Ghomeshi 1997). I take no stance on the correct analysis of ezâfe, and though I generally take it to be semantically vacuous, nothing hinges on this choice.…”
Section: Possession and The Ezâfe Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%