2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022010116287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Comparative chromosome painting was applied to the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) with mouse (M. musculus) chromosome-specific probes for understanding the process of chromosome rearrangements between the two species.The chromosome locations of the 5S and 18S-28S ribosomal RNA genes and the order of the 119 and Tcp-1 genes in the In(17)2 region of the t-complex were also compared.All the painting probes were successfully hybridized to the Indian spiny mouse chromosomes, and a total of 27 segments homologo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were similar to those of Matsubara et al [26]: rDNA clusters were present on three chromosomes 5, 8 and 12.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results were similar to those of Matsubara et al [26]: rDNA clusters were present on three chromosomes 5, 8 and 12.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Eight of the studied taxa showed a distribution of rDNA clusters that was identical to published data [see Table 1; [26,41,42]]. This included the rare subtelomeric position noted on chromosome 4 in M. m. domesticus [41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The P. sinensis chromosome paints were prepared and provided by Fengtang Yang and Patricia O’Brien, both from the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, UK. Chromosome painting was performed as described previously [12], [21]. One microgram of DNA probe was labeled with biotin-16-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics) using a nick translation kit (Roche Diagnostics).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could mean that other negative feedback loops are more important for adaptation than the ERK-MKP1 loop is, and indeed there are several other negative feedback loops. Active ERK1/2 can phosphorylate and thereby feed back upon its upstream regulators MEK, Raf, Sos, and the EGFR itself, and some or all of these loops may help generate the canonical pulse of ERK activity (Brunet et al, 1994;Fritsche-Guenther et al, 2011;Li et al, 2008;Matsuda et al, 1993;Shin et al, 2009). Or it could be that some other type of motif provides the adaptation.…”
Section: Negative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%