Giving voice to informal caregivers of community‐dwelling older adults: A systematic review of empowerment interventions

Abstract

Taking care for older adults can place informal caregivers at risk for developing health problems. Therefore, interventions aiming to empower informal caregivers have been developed. Empowerment refers to a health promotion process including strategies to improve informal caregivers' self‐care behaviours, stress‐management and caregiving skills. In literature, empowerment‐oriented interventions often target subsamples of informal caregivers defined through the care receiver's condition. These interventions, however, do not adequately capture the complexity of care needs and might even exclude informal caregivers taking care for older people without a specific diagnosis or with a subthreshold condition. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the content and effectiveness of empowerment‐oriented interventions directed at informal caregivers of community‐dwelling older adults. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed by searching the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Web of Science. From a total of 6798 unique publications, 13 intervention studies, of which seven randomised controlled trials, were eligible for inclusion. According to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, eight studies scored poor. The intervention studies under review represented different domains of empowerment, with cultivation of positive feelings being the most prevalent one. Social participation and physical health received little attention in interventions. Although no adverse intervention effects were observed, the studies reported mixed results with 57 positive and 47 neutral effects. The limited number and poor quality of studies emphasise the need for future research investigating the effectiveness of empowerment‐oriented interventions targeting informal caregivers of older adults.

Supported: Supporting, enabling, and sustaining homecare workers to deliver end-of-life care: A qualitative study protocol

“…How those services may interact with HCWs working alongside other practitioners is an aspect that will be discussed in the interviews where appropriate. We also acknowledge the significant number of carers, such as family and friends, who provide care [33], and are often not considered when training for HCWs is developed; and incorporate this often overlooked perspective [34] However, there are considerably greater numbers of studies focusing on family carers and their needs [35][36][37]. As such this study focuses on the provision by HCWs which does not receive as much attention.…”

Effectiveness of a Participatory Program for Improving the Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Health of Older Farmers in Rural Korea

“…Baydur et al reported that a participatory training method empowered and improved the capacity of participants to change lifestyle behaviors of farmers [ 16 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have estimated the effectiveness of health empowerment for the CCV health of older adults [ 29 ]. Our study results indicated that participatory methods were more effective than conventional lecture methods for empowering older farmers to improve their CCV health.…”

Implementing Aging in Place in Hong Kong: Meeting the Needs and Aspirations of Older Adults and Their Caregivers Living in Private Housing

“…The concept of a socially active neighbourhood has been proposed to support aging in place [ 5 ]. Remote consultations [ 6 ], empowerment of caregivers [ 7 ], lifestyle redesign [ 8 ], mobility training for those who are frail [ 9 ], early identification and management of mental health [ 10 ], community exercise programmes [ 11 ], and programmes designed following a comprehensive assessment of needs [ 12 , 13 ] have been discussed. In particular, poor mobility capacity has been identified as a potent modifiable risk factor for incident disability and the quality of life [ 14 ].…”