2004
DOI: 10.1177/0899764004263423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving to Secular Causes by the Religious and Nonreligious: An Experimental Test of the Responsiveness of Giving to Subsidies

Abstract: Although evidence indicates that religious persons are more generous on average than nonreligious persons, little work has been done to determine if this greater generosity is a general pattern or is, rather, specific to church-based institutions. Limited research addresses if, or how, religious and nonreligious givers respond to subsidies. This article uses experimental data to examine differences in the amount and pattern of giving to secular charities in response to subsidies by self-identified religious an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, material costs and benefits are broadly defined as the "tangible consequences that are associated with monetary value" [38]. Clearly, giving money costs money, and previous research finds that giving increases when the costs of a donation are reduced [57,58]. However, the costs of a donation sometimes involve more than just money.…”
Section: Costs and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, material costs and benefits are broadly defined as the "tangible consequences that are associated with monetary value" [38]. Clearly, giving money costs money, and previous research finds that giving increases when the costs of a donation are reduced [57,58]. However, the costs of a donation sometimes involve more than just money.…”
Section: Costs and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While self-regarding dictators should give nothing, experimental ones tend to give in the region of 20-30%. Eckel and Grossman (2004) study a DG where 167 U.S. college students were asked to split an endowment of cash between themselves and a non-religious charity they chose from a list under twelve different donation conditions, relating to the size of the endowment as well as rebates and matching funds given by the experimenters. Subjects were classified as either religious or non-religious according to whether they reported to attend religious services regularly.…”
Section: Altruism and Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive, but nuanced relationship between religion and giving in the Australian context was reported by Lyons and Nivision-Smith (2006) [59]. However, [109] found no relationship between "religious identity" and giving to non-religious causes.…”
Section: Religionmentioning
confidence: 78%