2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00434.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

Abstract: The common wisdom in journalistic accounts of earmarking is that Congress distributes earmarks on a purely political basis, without any consideration for the demand for federal spending. Academic accounts similarly argue that factors internal to Congress are preeminent in determining where earmarks go, even more than for other types of pork-barrel spending. Using earmarks appearing in the fiscal year 2008 Appropriations bills, I search for both chamber-based and demand-side determinants of the distribution of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…257–59). Specific expenditures, such as the size of federal old age assistance benefits (Amenta et al, , pp. 524, 533), the dollar value of congressional earmarks (Lazarus, , pp. 341–42), and school district budgets (Robinson, Caver, Meier, & O'Toole, , p. 144). Bureaucratic activities mandated directly by the legislature; no article included any.Three types were measures made up of multiple instances of the first three , often described as part of a policy domain—a set of policies conventionally seen as linked substantively, organizationally, and culturally (Burstein, , pp.…”
Section: Approach and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…257–59). Specific expenditures, such as the size of federal old age assistance benefits (Amenta et al, , pp. 524, 533), the dollar value of congressional earmarks (Lazarus, , pp. 341–42), and school district budgets (Robinson, Caver, Meier, & O'Toole, , p. 144). Bureaucratic activities mandated directly by the legislature; no article included any.Three types were measures made up of multiple instances of the first three , often described as part of a policy domain—a set of policies conventionally seen as linked substantively, organizationally, and culturally (Burstein, , pp.…”
Section: Approach and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated topics of perennial interest include procurement set-asides (Rice, 1992); earmarks (Kunz, 2009), including concerns with "pork" (Lazarus, 2010); fair and reasonable profits (Kaiser & Smith, 1980;Perine, 2007); probity in government-vendor relationships (Walton, 1996); procurement consolidation or "bundling" (Ireton, 2003;Nerenz, 2007); and privatization and outsourcing (Fitch, 1988;Hefetz & Warner, 2004;Van Slyke, 2003).…”
Section: Public Procurement In the Mpl Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of a demand variable is that it conveys a legitimacy to earmarks, otherwise linked to what Lazarus characterizes as distribution ''on a purely political basis.'' 25 He finds that political factorsFmember ideology, seniority, committee membership, and electoral vulnerabilityFmatter, but so does demand, as conceptualized and computed by Lazarus, though precisely how it is then brought to bear within Congress is not entirely clear.…”
Section: Earmarks: a Means To What End And For Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%