2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving space to multicriteria analysis for complex cultural heritage systems: The case of the castles in Valle D’Aosta Region, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
21
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a large number of aspects and of diversified nature, often in conflict, and many of them difficult to be quantified has led to the application of multi-criteria techniques to the evaluation of the various alternative projects [10]. Methods such as the Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Analytical Network Process, (ANP), the Fuzzi-set theory, and the Weighted Sum Model (WSM), were used for the selection of reuse alternatives and enhancement strategies [11], [12]. What stands at the base of the methods above is the idea to put in relation the characteristics of a project with the objectives and the preferences (i.e.…”
Section: The Use Compatibility Approach To the Project Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a large number of aspects and of diversified nature, often in conflict, and many of them difficult to be quantified has led to the application of multi-criteria techniques to the evaluation of the various alternative projects [10]. Methods such as the Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Analytical Network Process, (ANP), the Fuzzi-set theory, and the Weighted Sum Model (WSM), were used for the selection of reuse alternatives and enhancement strategies [11], [12]. What stands at the base of the methods above is the idea to put in relation the characteristics of a project with the objectives and the preferences (i.e.…”
Section: The Use Compatibility Approach To the Project Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications in built heritage and energy efficiency [14] [15], cultural heritage management (e.g. castles, ecclesiastical heritage) [16] [17], traditional rural buildings [18], contemporary heritage [19] or city heritage management [7] [20] [21] [22], can be found in the literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of evaluation methods for diffuse cultural heritage, the estimation of economic benefits related to slow routes, can be made through the contingent valuation method (Maltese et al 2017). In terms of spatial analysis, the combination between multi criteria and GIS-based analysis seems to be an effective method to support new strategies for the enhancement of complex system of cultural built heritage (Oppio et al, 2015), but also to analyze strengths and weaknesses of cultural routes, in relation to rural landscape planning (Balestrieri et al, 2015), and for spatial classification of rural land crossed by cultural routes (Diti et al, 2015). In the research field of walkability index, many studies refer to urban space, and generally explore the relationships between urban environment and users (Cervero et al, 1997), (Cervero et al, 2003) (Frank et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%