Giving Social Ties, Reciprocity in Modern Society

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the meaning of giftgiving and reciprocity in modern society and thereby following the pointers left by Marcel Mauss. A critique will be made of the dichotomy of self-interest and normatively orientated action that forms the basis of sociology. For this conceptual dichotomization has caused forms of social interaction that cannot be localized either on the side of self-interest or on that of morality. It is the logic of the gift and the reciprocity thus evoked that in our view accompanies and structures all forms of interaction, from the social micro to the macrolevel. It is shown that in modern societies gifts and reciprocities form their own orders of interaction, and not only on a microsocial level. The principle of reciprocity even accompanies as a rule transfers owing to (state) compulsion as well as economic, selective exchange. As a basic principle of processes of sociation it is, fundamentally, present everywhere and in some areas it is explicitly and openly in effect (for example in welfare state transfers). Sociology has for too long overlooked the fact that this principle cannot be traced back either to normativist or to utilitarian explanations and nevertheless represents a principle of construction of modern societies.

The great transformation of embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the new economic sociology

“…Despite their origins in sociology (Durkheim, Mauss), they were long neglected in economic sociology. Recently, however, they have been successfully applied to the analysis of economic exchange by economic sociologists (Godbut/Caillé 1998;Steiner 2004;Healy 2006;Adloff/Mau 2006).…”

Sexualidade, cuidado e relações de poder na diáspora: as imigrantes brasileiras no universo das casas de alterne em Lisboa

“…Como defendeu Mauss (2008) acerca do dom e contradom, o ato de dar e a reciprocidade induzida nesse ato são práticas sociais profundas que, embora não sejam fundamentadas no interesse em si e se baseiem numa suposta espontaneidade, não são atos desinteressados pois só estabelecem e perpetuam relações a partir da dívida mútua (Adloff;Mau, 2006).…”

Rationality, Responsibility, Health Care: Motivation for Childbearing at the Edge of the 21st Century in Russia

“…Подарок в рамках этих теорий рассматривается как проявление символического капитала ] и средство для установления реципрокных связей [Mauss 1990] между дарителем и получателем (см. также: [Adloff, Mau 2006]). В такой трактовке значимыми являются субъект, осуществляющий процедуру дарения, и смысл, который он в неё вкладывает.…”