Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury

Abstract

This study is one of a series investigating everyday communication skills of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) using communication partners other than speech pathologists or research assistants. The ®rst of these studies examined telephone conversations where subjects were asked to request speci®c information during telephone interactions with a range of communication partners. Results indicated that people with TBI were disadvantaged in some of their interactions on the telephone with community agencies and family members during information-seeking interactions, when compared with matched controls. TBI subjects were given less information than matched controls and were also asked for less information. For example, therapists never asked TBI subjects questions to which they didn't already know the answer. This was in contrast to the control interactions, where subjects were asked for novel information.In the current study seven subjects with TBI were compared with seven matched control subjects across two conditions: a community education information-giving session with two schoolboys, and an information-requesting interaction with the researcher. Exchange structure analysis showed that when placed in an information-giving role, TBI subjects gave similar amounts of information as control subjects. TBI subjects used joke telling as an information -giving device, serving a number of communicative functions, which are discussed. There was no signi®cant diåerence in the amount of information requested or given by TBI and control subjects in the researcher condition ; however there were signi®cant qualitative diåerences in the nature of the requesting. It has been previously emphasized that people with TBI should be evaluated with a number of interlocutors as part of a thorough communication needs assessment (Hartley 1995). Merely varying the interlocutor is not su¬cient, however, as the goal of the interaction and the primary speaking roles of participants are also important, and will determine the language choices available to both speakers. Exchange structure analysis is a useful way to delineate these language choices, as it is interpreted in light of the genre of the interaction and the tenor and communicative purpose of the participants.

Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury

“…Dave described himself in this manner. However, as previously reported by Togher [52], he suggested that his passive communication style was context specific. When communicating with a friend who did not dominate the conversation he was able to take the role of the talker.…”

Terminology and Methodology in the Assessment of Cognitive-Linguistic Disorders

“…Factors that would be taken into account in consideration of a client's communication environment include people with whom a client has the opportunity or inclination to interact, physical and emotional environments in which interaction takes place and the combination of daily routines and significant events that make up people's lives (Togher, 2000;Ylvisaker, 2003).…”

The effect of stuttering on communication: A preliminary investigation

“…For example, the interpersonal linguistic resources of people with aphasia (Ferguson, 1992; and people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Togher and Hand 1998) has been explored. Togher has also investigated the conversational interactions of people with TBI (Togher, Hand, and Code, 1999;Togher, 2000;. SFL has also been applied in the areas of dementia (Mortensen, 2005); acquired language disorder in children (Rigaudeau-McKenna, 2005), developmental language disorder in children (Thomson, 2005), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Mathers, 2005), and Asperger's Syndrome (Bartlett, Armstrong, and Roberts, 2005).…”