1987
DOI: 10.1080/09500798709533221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving and getting feedback on composition: A comparison of teacher and student verbal report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All assessors' comments predominantly highlighted deficiencies and omissions rather than strengths or reactions to students' ideas. Cohen and Cavalcanti (1987) also found that students rarely took specific action in response to feedback. Most reported making a 'mental note' of comments for future reference, but few attempted to correct the error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All assessors' comments predominantly highlighted deficiencies and omissions rather than strengths or reactions to students' ideas. Cohen and Cavalcanti (1987) also found that students rarely took specific action in response to feedback. Most reported making a 'mental note' of comments for future reference, but few attempted to correct the error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Dweck (1988) claims that students who have a positive theory of their own intelligence and view themselves as capable learners are more likely to persist in the face of learning challenges than students with a lesser sense of self-efficacy. Cohen and Cavalcanti's (1987) study of students' responses to feedback on essays revealed that most students prefer more teacher comments on content and organization, while others want comments on grammar. Their research found a relationship between the grade and the amount of feedback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most studies have focused on the types of revisions made by students (e.g., Belcher, 1989;Chandrasegeran, 1986;Chenoweth, 1987;Gaskill, 1987;Hall, 1987Hall, , 1990Sato, 1990;Tagong, 1992) or on pedagogical techniques (such as reformulation or topical structure analysis) for helping students to revise (Allwright, 1988;Cerniglia, Medsker, & Connor, 1990;Cohen, 1983Cohen, , 1990Connor & Farmer, 1990;Johns, 1986aJohns, , 1986b. L2 studies of feedback and revision have examined differences in students' ability to process feedback and revise successfully (Barnes, 1984;Cohen & Cavalcanti, 1987), the effects of teacher versus peer feedback (Chaudron, 1983(Chaudron, , 1984Connor & Asenavage, 1994;Hedgcock & Lefkowitz, 1992), and the impact of content-versus form-based feedback (Cohen & Cavalcanti, 1990;Fathman & Whalley, 1990;Kepner, 1991;Russikoff & Kogan, 1996).…”
Section: L2 Studies On Teacher Feedback and Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study under consideration in this article was the second in a series of smallscale studies aimed at investigating the relationship between what teachers provide as feedback on compositions and what students think about and do with this feedback (Cohen & Cavalcanti, 1987. This study dealt with feedback in Englishforeign-language (EFL) and Portuguese-native-language (LI) compositions.…”
Section: A Study Using Verbal Report: Giving and Getting Written Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%