Give me a kiss! An integrative rehabilitative training program with motor imagery and mirror therapy for recovery of facial palsy

Abstract

This provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance.A copyedited and fully formatted version will be made available soon. The final version may contain major or minor changes. Subscription: Information about subscribing to Minerva Medica journals is online at:http://www.minervamedica.it/en/how-to-order-journals.php Reprints and permissions: For information about reprints and permissions send an email to:journals.dept@minervamedica.it -journals2.dept@minervamedica.it -journals6.dept@minervamedica.it EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA Abstract BACKGROUND: Peripheral facial nerve palsy (FNP) can have various causes, such as Bell's palsy or after surgery for acoustic neuroma. Rehabilitation is often required but there is no evidence that any rehabilitation approach is more efficacious than another.AIM: The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of neurocognitive-rehabilitative approach through mirror-therapy (MT) and motor-imagery (MI), integrated into the traditional rehabilitation with mime-therapy and myofascial-approach.DESIGN: This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, controlled-trial. POPULATION: Twenty-two patients were randomized into two groups: mirror-therapy (N=11, MT and MI) and traditional-rehabilitative group (N=11, mime-therapy and a myofascial-approach). METHODS: Outcome assessments were performed before treatment (T0), after one month (T1=10 session, twice/week), after the second and third months (T2=10 twice/week + 5 of MT+MI one/week and T3=10 twice/week + 5 of MT+MI 1/week), and at the 4-week follow-up (T4=2 months follow-up).RESULTS: The analysis of the functional evaluations show that both groups experienced progressive improvement T0 to T3, with stabilization of the results at the follow-up. There was a significant difference in House-Brackmann-Scale scores between T0 and follow-up in favor of the experimental group. In terms of quality of life (FaCE scale), total scores and social function items improved in both groups from T0 to T3. The experimental group obtained better results with regard to quality of life and emotional depression. COPYRIGHT© EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICAThis document is

Body illusions for mental health: a systematic review

“…All the seventeen analyzed studies directed to modulate motor responses in clinical populations used BI toward a body part (see Table 3) (Cha & Oh, 2016;Cristina et al, 2015;Diers et al, 2010;Dohle et al, 2009;Grunt et al, 2017;Ji & Kim, 2014;J. A. Kang et al, 2017;Kim & Lee, 2015;Kojima et al, 2014;Lin et al, 2014;Louw et al, 2017;Paolucci et al, 2020;Perepelkina et al, 2019;Spychala et al, 2020;Thieme et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2013).…”

“…A. Kang et al, 2017;Paolucci et al, 2020). In the study from Paolucci and colleagues (2020), the authors conducted a double blind randomized control trial with twentytwo patients presenting peripheral facial nerve palsy, to test a neurocognitive-rehabilitative approach through mirror-therapy and motor-imagery, integrated into the traditional rehabilitation with mime-therapy and myofascial-approach.…”

“…Most of the reviewed studies in this systematic review using BIs to improve motor responses used the MBI (Cha & Oh, 2016;Choi et al, 2019;Cristina et al, 2015;Diers et al, 2010;Dohle et al, 2009;Grunt et al, 2017;In et al, 2016;Ji & Kim, 2014;Y. J. Kang et al, 2011;Kim & Lee, 2015;Kojima et al, 2014;Lin et al, 2014;Paolucci et al, 2020;Thieme et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2013). The MBI has been found useful for motor recovery in many studies (see Bolognini et al, 2015;Ramachandran et al, 2009).…”

Therapists’ perceptions and attitudes in facial palsy rehabilitation therapy: A mixed methods study

“…Although previous studies have shown a beneficial effect of rehabilitation therapy on facial palsy outcomes, there is some variation in the types of treatments used and in the heterogeneity of the study populations (e.g. difference in etiology of facial palsy) (Barbara et al, 2010;Beurskens andHeymans, 2003, 2006;Manikandan, 2007;Nakamura et al, 2003;Paolucci et al, 2019;Ross, Nedzelski, and McLean, 1991;Segal et al, 1995). Studies from various medical fields such as gynecology, urology, cardiology, orthopedic surgery, and physical therapy reported an association between practice patterns and care provider characteristics (Archer et al, 2009a;Archer, MacKenzie, Castillo, and Bosse, 2009b;Graham, Maddox, Itani, and Hawn, 2013;Hamilton et al, 2012;Harper, Brown, Foster-Rosales, and Raine, 2010;Li and Bombardier, 2001;Mikhail, Korner-Bitensky, Rossignol, and Dumas, 2005).…”

Massage Therapy’s Effectiveness on the Decoding EEG Rhythms of Left/Right Motor Imagery and Motion Execution in Patients With Skeletal Muscle Pain

“…Motor imagery (MI) is described as the concept of imagining a motor task without resulting in physical execution [12], [13]. As an important paradigm of spontaneous brain computer interfaces (BCI), MI has been widely used in the rehabilitation for the motor dysfunction patients [14]- [17] (facial palsy [15] and knee arthroplasty [17]), disorders of consciousness, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and autism spectrum disorder [18]. BCI translates EEG signals into control commands so that physically impaired patients can control assistive devices.…”