GIS-based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three-dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China

Zhou, Dun-Jin; Li, Xiaozhao; Wang, Qi; Wang, Rui; Wang, Tianding; Gu, Qing; Xin, Yunxiao

doi:10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.017

Cited by 42 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Multiple efforts have been made to evaluate the so-called UUS resources, including physical space, geothermal energy, groundwater, and geomaterials. Some works, principally those from the Deep City Project [4,26,27,126,127], consider the four UUS assets comprehensively, while others deal with only one or two (mostly on physical space [128][129][130][131]) of the four UUS assets. The recent work of Price et al [132] incorporated the UUS asset of space continuum into the framework of ground-use optimization.…”

Section: Integrated Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions

Peng

Qiao

Sabri

et al. 2021

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The utilization of urban underground space (UUS) offers an effective solution to urban problems but may also negatively affect urban development. Therefore, UUS development needs better concerted guidelines to coordinate various urban systems and the multiple components of the underground world. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which should be viewed as important yardsticks for UUS development, do not explicitly mention urban underground space, although many of them are affected by both the positive and negative consequences of its development. To fill this gap, this review lays the foundations of relevant UUS concepts and uses exemplary cases to reveal that 11 out of 17 SDGs can be linked with UUS uses. These linkages also manifest that land administration, integrated planning, architectural design, and construction technology are critical dimensions for increasing the contributions of UUS to the realization of SDGs. To achieve multi-disciplinary synergies among these four critical dimensions, a collaborative approach framework based on spatial data infrastructure is required. Thus, this work provides academics and practitioners with a holistic view of sustainable UUS development.

show abstract

Section: Integrated Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions

Peng

Qiao

Sabri

et al. 2021

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The findings of the Railway Accident Investigation Branch, for both incidents, clearly demonstrated why it is essential for railway and urban stakeholders to have effective whole life multi-disciplinary evidence-based comprehension of the interfaces. Not only from physical civil engineering considerations, as current discussions suggest are required (Gov.UK, undated(a); Zhou et al, 2019;Yuan et al, 2020), but also from legal, asset management, historical, geographical, and urban management perspectives (International Tunnelling Association, 1991;Zimmerman, 2004;Chrimes, 2006;Atazadeh et al, 2016;Besner, 2016;Network Rail, 2021b).…”

Section: Contextualising the Research Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To enable the effective safe presence and operation of those metros within their densifying urban environments, it is essential to comprehend how they affect and can be affected by their environment (Durmisevic and Sariyildiz, 2001;Rinaldi, Peerenboom, and Kelly, 2001;Zimmerman, 2004;Besner, 2016). This is necessary not only for the short-term of metro construction or urban redevelopment but effective day-to-day long-term (50+ years) asset and urban management planning and processes (Price et al, 2016;Li, 2019;Von der Tann et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A qualitative analysis of the interfaces between urban underground metro infrastructure and its environment in London

Darroch

Beecroft

Nelson

2021

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The AHP method was utilized to assign the weights through constructing the judgment matrix of evaluation indicators. To tackle this issue that the judgment matrix is challenging to obtain partly, the optimal transfer matrix was applied to optimize the traditional AHP method, so as to determine the weights of UUSR evaluation indicators more rationally [14,[31][32][33]. Despite this effort, when the AHP method is used to calculate the weight, the construction of judgment matrix of evaluation indicators is still not easy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the basis of many applications of weight assignment models for UUSR evaluation indicators [14,23,[31][32][33], we found that they still have many shortcomings and utilization limitations. No matter whether they are subjective or objective, weighting methods are simplistic and homogenized for UUSR evaluation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Hybrid Weight Assignment Model for Urban Underground Space Resources Evaluation Integrated with the Weight of Time Dimension

Liu

Yang

2020

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The utilization of urban underground space resources (UUSR) are important approaches to effectively save land resources, improve the living environment, expand the urban space, and achieve sustainable urban development. To obtain accurate UUSR evaluation results, the weight assignment of indicators plays an important role in the evaluation process and is an indispensable part of it. Reasonable weights of indicators can greatly improve the accuracy of the final UUSR evaluation results. Neither the basic characteristics of cross-section data and time series data of UUSR evaluation indicators are taken into consideration simultaneously, nor is the combination and cross application of different weighting methods in the previous weight assignment of UUSR evaluation indicators. Considering the influence of the time dimension, the weighting method of time dimension is introduced into the UUSR evaluation. Through integrating the classical entropy weight method, which is a frequently-used weighting method of indicator dimension with the weighting method of time dimension in two different approaches by time ordered weighted averaging (TOWA) operator, the hybrid weight assignment model named entropy and time weighting model (E-TW) for UUSR evaluation is proposed. The experimental calculation results show that the UUSR evaluation results using the E-TW model are significantly better than the results using the single classical entropy weight method, which means the hybrid weight assignment model is more suitable for UUSR evaluation than the single weighting method of indicator dimension.

show abstract

GIS-based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three-dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China

Cited by 42 publications

References 21 publications

A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions

A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions

A qualitative analysis of the interfaces between urban underground metro infrastructure and its environment in London

A Hybrid Weight Assignment Model for Urban Underground Space Resources Evaluation Integrated with the Weight of Time Dimension

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About