2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-07124-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach (GIS-MCDA) for investigating mass movements’ hazard susceptibility along the first section of the Algerian North-South Highway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been applied in a variety of fields to help in the process of decision-making and planning field. This technique is widely used in landslides susceptibility mapping and approved by many researchers (Ayalew et al 2005;Yalcin 2008;Yalcin et al 2011;Pourghasemi et al 2012a;Moragues et al 2021, Goumrasa et al 2021. Overall, the AHP is based on three main steps: decomposition, comparative judgment, and synthesis of priorities.…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This method has been applied in a variety of fields to help in the process of decision-making and planning field. This technique is widely used in landslides susceptibility mapping and approved by many researchers (Ayalew et al 2005;Yalcin 2008;Yalcin et al 2011;Pourghasemi et al 2012a;Moragues et al 2021, Goumrasa et al 2021. Overall, the AHP is based on three main steps: decomposition, comparative judgment, and synthesis of priorities.…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some authors define the qualitative approaches based on subjective decision rules to assign weights to landslide conditioning factors as semi-quantitative models. This category mainly includes the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches which offer various tools for incorporating, ranking, and weighting the different variables, using subjective decision rules (Yalcin, 2008;Pourghasemi et al 2012a;Chen et al 2016;Pradhan et al 2016;Achour et al 2017;Moragues et al 2020;Shano et al 2020;Abija et al 2020;Goumrasa et al 2021;Roy et al 2022). Moreover, the MCDA models are relevant for all scales of the study area (Guzzetti et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations