2019
DOI: 10.4314/mejs.v11i1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS-based Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach: The Case of Tarmaber District, Ethiopia

Abstract: Landslides are one of the natural threats that often result in great loss of life and destruction of property in Ethiopia. One of the areas that is affected by landslides of different types and sizes is the Tarmaber district in the rift margin in the central part of Ethiopia. Keeping in view the cause and effect relationship and mitigation, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach is used in the present case to understand the possible causes for landslides. Based on AHP, landslide susceptibility map is prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
23
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the FAHP method, has been described in detail in the literature (Saaty 1977;Carver 1991;Malczewski 1999;Ohta et al 2007;Chen et al 2016;Abay et al 2019), discretizes the normalized values of each vulnerability factor to generate fuzzy variables, each allowing for 3 possible "membership" values: 0 (the minimum), 1 (the maximum) and an intermediate value reflecting the shape of the distribution. Each fuzzified vulnerability factor can take, thus, one of these membership values at a given location.…”
Section: Landslide Vulnerability Map Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the FAHP method, has been described in detail in the literature (Saaty 1977;Carver 1991;Malczewski 1999;Ohta et al 2007;Chen et al 2016;Abay et al 2019), discretizes the normalized values of each vulnerability factor to generate fuzzy variables, each allowing for 3 possible "membership" values: 0 (the minimum), 1 (the maximum) and an intermediate value reflecting the shape of the distribution. Each fuzzified vulnerability factor can take, thus, one of these membership values at a given location.…”
Section: Landslide Vulnerability Map Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, qualitative methodologies that operate in weighting and rating procedures are called semi-quantitative techniques [7,24]. These methodologies are the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [2,5,13,26,[36][37][38][39][40] and the weighted linear combination (WLC) [24,41]. The WLC method includes a combination of several landslide factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al 2016;Abay et al 2019), discretizes the normalized values of each vulnerability factor to generate fuzzy variables, each allowing for 3 possible "membership" values: 0 (the minimum), 1 (the maximum) and an intermediate value reflecting the shape of the distribution. Each fuzzified vulnerability factor can take, thus, one of these membership values at a given location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%