2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5732-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis using frequency ratio and evidential belief function models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various models including probabilistic approach (Chang et al 2014), rock engineering system and fuzzy C-means algorithm (Li et al 2017), empirical models (Kappes et al 2011;Horton et al 2013), artificial neural network (Chang and Chao 2006), logistic regression (LR) (Ayalew and Yamagishi 2005;Greco et al 2007), analytic hierarchy process (Yalcin 2008), clast distribution patterns (Faria Lima Lopes et al 2016), qualitative heuristic method, Flow-R (Blais-Stevens and Behnia 2016), and advanced Bayesian spatial models (Lombardo et al 2018) have been used for DFSM. Furthermore, the frequency ratio (FR) method has been proven to be effective, and it has been successfully applied to flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping and landslide susceptibility mapping (Cao et al 2016;Wang et al 2016;Zhang et al 2016). In view of the effectiveness of FR method, in the present study, this method was selected as the statistical method to better explore the effect of different mapping units on the susceptibility mapping of debris flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models including probabilistic approach (Chang et al 2014), rock engineering system and fuzzy C-means algorithm (Li et al 2017), empirical models (Kappes et al 2011;Horton et al 2013), artificial neural network (Chang and Chao 2006), logistic regression (LR) (Ayalew and Yamagishi 2005;Greco et al 2007), analytic hierarchy process (Yalcin 2008), clast distribution patterns (Faria Lima Lopes et al 2016), qualitative heuristic method, Flow-R (Blais-Stevens and Behnia 2016), and advanced Bayesian spatial models (Lombardo et al 2018) have been used for DFSM. Furthermore, the frequency ratio (FR) method has been proven to be effective, and it has been successfully applied to flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping and landslide susceptibility mapping (Cao et al 2016;Wang et al 2016;Zhang et al 2016). In view of the effectiveness of FR method, in the present study, this method was selected as the statistical method to better explore the effect of different mapping units on the susceptibility mapping of debris flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical models are most commonly used in landslide susceptibility mapping, which are based on the analysis of the relationships between influencing factors and existing landslides [7]. In these statistical approaches, bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques are used for landslide susceptibility mapping throughout the world, including frequency ratio [8][9][10], index of entropy [11][12][13][14][15], bivariate statistical analysis [16], multivariate adaptive regression spline [17], analytical hierarchy process [18,19], statistical index [20,21], weight of evidence [13,21], evidential belief function [22,23], certainty factor [24,25], and logistic regression [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are widely used in natural hazards mapping. Frequency ratio (FR) and statistical index (SI) models have been applied to landslide susceptibility mapping, and results found that these models are reasonably accurate and efficient [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%