GIS Landslide 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-54391-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS Application in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Indian Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, gradient from 0 o to 30 o have found to have positive weight values (Table 1). Results of this study contrasts with that of Kayastha et al (2012Kayastha et al ( , 2013 and Sarkar et al (2006) ) as their research sites had positive weight values for slopes greater than 25 o . These slopes are major cultivated lands and grasslands which are devoid of trees.…”
Section: Factor Classes With Positive Weighted Valuescontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, gradient from 0 o to 30 o have found to have positive weight values (Table 1). Results of this study contrasts with that of Kayastha et al (2012Kayastha et al ( , 2013 and Sarkar et al (2006) ) as their research sites had positive weight values for slopes greater than 25 o . These slopes are major cultivated lands and grasslands which are devoid of trees.…”
Section: Factor Classes With Positive Weighted Valuescontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Bedding structure, prominent joints, differential rates of weathering and erosion of the sedimentary rocks of the Siwaliks and meta-sedimentary and metamorphic rocks of the Lesser Himalaya (northern part of the Banganga River Basin) were geological characteristics controlling the landslide types and processes (Ghimire 2010). Banded gneiss in Kankai watershed (Kayastha et al 2012) and phyllite and gneiss of Sikkim (Sarkar et al 2006) were contributing to landslids and hence produced positive weight values. Areas with lithology of phyllite, schist and gneiss contribute to landslides where high degree of foliation and weathering play crucial role.…”
Section: Fig 5: Landslide Inventory Of Research Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models and methodologies have been utilized to decide the impact of causal factors on landslide occurrence, of which the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method based on fuzzy logic [23], analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [24][25][26], and weighted linear combination [27] are most commonly used. In terms of statistical methods, the frequency ratio method is the simplest and easiest to perform, while the information value (IV) [28,29] and weight of evidence (WOE) [30,31] methods are useful in determining the impact of causal factor class on landslide occurrence. Logistic regression (LR) is also used by many researchers for determining the weight of the causal factors [17,26,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information value method (IVM) is a datadriven technique that can evaluate the objective assessment for landslide susceptibility. This method calculates the relationship between the dependent variable (landslides) and the independent variable (causative factor) based on the weightage of the influence (Yin and Yan, 1988;Sarkar et al, 2012). The calculation of IVM weight is based on the rationing of each factor class landslide density to the total landslide density in the respective causative factor (Pradhan et al, 2012;Sarkar et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Information Value Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%