Girls and Women in Conflict with the Law

Scott, Terri; Wagstaff, Megan; Conley, Cassandra

doi:10.1002/9781119874898.ch5

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A general interpretation of these constructs is as prosocial, positive facets of life for individuals (Jones, 2011;Jones et al, 2015;, helping individuals achieve positive outcomes. Rehabilitation for JI individuals is designed to reduce risk of recidivism; it can help manage risk and reduce offending, as well as enhance their quality of life (Baglivio et al, 2014;Scott et al, 2022;Van Damme et al, 2022;Wainwright & Nee, 2014). Due to unique etiologies of offending between men and women, strength considerations should also be distinct by gender.…”

Section: Chapter 5 General Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is despite research articles and policy recommendations to acknowledge specific needs of JI women as early as 1980, with further research progressing through the 1990s (see Messina & Esparza, 2022). Research on alternative pathways into (and out of crime) for women has become more prevalent, gaining traction and acceptance (Bloom et al, 2004;Messina & Esparza, 2022;Scott et al, 2022;Van Voorhis et al, 2010;Wattanaporn & Holtfreter;Wright et al, 2013). This dissertation research is founded upon the expectation of some risk and strength variables being gender-responsive (i.e., gender-salient or -specific), in addition to gender-neutral variables (Pettersen, 2021).…”

Section: Orientation In Strength and Gender Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Changing GEARS: Development and Validation of Gendered Emerging-Adult Rehabilitative Strengths Measures

Baglole

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are currently no self-report strength measures designed for justice-involved (JI), emergingadult (EA) men and women. This dissertation is part of a proposed program of research to attain that goal, and contribute to current fundamental work on gendered research and strengths in a correctional context.Study 1 involved meta-analytic review of studies measuring strengths in relation to offending outcomes, using samples of justice-involved clients disaggregated by gender. Eligible studies (k = 19) involving gender-disaggregated samples of justice-involved women (aggregate n = 1,699, 54.4% adolescents) and men (aggregate n = 6,556, 72.4% adolescents) were collected.From the final study set, 32 strengths were assessed in men and boys, 18 (56%) of which were significantly related to desistance. Comparatively, of 16 strengths assessed in women or girls, 10 (63%) were related to desistance. Strengths with the largest effects were 'Network' and 'Mental health' for women, and 'Motivation' and 'Regulation' for men.In Study 2, forensic professionals (N = 25) rated the ability of strengths from Study 1 to predict desistance for justice-involved men and women, and suggested additional items that were not included. Of the 37 strength items proposed to professionals, 10 items were rated as probably having predictive utility toward desistance for JI women and men. 'Cognitive regulation' showed gender-salience in men, whereas 'Emotional support' and 'Dependent children' showed gendersalience in women.Strengths from Study 1 and suggested by professionals in Study 2 constituted an item pool for Study 3. This pilot study used methods of criterion and construct validity to form gendered measures for emerging-adult men and women. Three-factor, 16-item measures were derived for men and women, respectively, each demonstrating strong psychometric properties. GENDERED STRENGTHS FOR JUSTICE-INVOLVED POPULATIONS Baglole xv GlossaryCNV: Criminal, non-violent behaviour, as assessed by item in the Antisocial Behaviours Scale (ABS).CV: Criminal, violent behaviour, as assessed by item in the Antisocial Behaviours Scale (ABS).Desistance: An ongoing process of intent and action toward cessation from offending.Emerging adults (EAs): Refers to young adults, specifically those within the age range from 18 to 25 years old.External factor: Variables, such as strengths, that derive from outside the self; examples include parental warmth and instrumental support. Gender-neutral:In forensic assessment, variables, such as strengths, that have predictive utility (i.e., are empirically related to desistance) in both genders equally.Gender-responsive: Umbrella term for gender-salient and -specific variables. Gender-salient:In forensic assessment, variables, such as strengths, that have predictive utility in both genders, yet higher utility (i.e., has a stronger statistical relationship with desistance) in one gender versus another. Gender-specific:In forensic assessment, variables, such as strengths, that have predictive utility (i.e., are empirically rel...

show abstract

Section: Chapter 5 General Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Orientation In Strength and Gender Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Changing GEARS: Development and Validation of Gendered Emerging-Adult Rehabilitative Strengths Measures

Baglole

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Girls and Women in Conflict with the Law

Cited by 1 publication

References 58 publications

Changing GEARS: Development and Validation of Gendered Emerging-Adult Rehabilitative Strengths Measures

Changing GEARS: Development and Validation of Gendered Emerging-Adult Rehabilitative Strengths Measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About