2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-010-0356-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ginzburg–Landau Vortices Driven by the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an analytical perspective, the stabilization of magnetic vortices is essentially due to curling boundary conditions induced by stray-field interaction (e.g. [15]) rather than intrinsic effects as in the case of skyrmions. Our goal is to investigate the range of existence of isolated skyrmions emerging as energy minimizers in a simplified ferromagnetic model in the plane, including DM and Zeeman interaction.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an analytical perspective, the stabilization of magnetic vortices is essentially due to curling boundary conditions induced by stray-field interaction (e.g. [15]) rather than intrinsic effects as in the case of skyrmions. Our goal is to investigate the range of existence of isolated skyrmions emerging as energy minimizers in a simplified ferromagnetic model in the plane, including DM and Zeeman interaction.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…magnetic vortices, is concerned. Recent results show that in the presence of strong potentials of Ginzburg-Landau type, conventional energy bounds can be bypassed by certain well-preparedness assumptions on the initial data that prevent the formation of (extra) bubbles, see [21,20].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover in stereographic coordinates (11) ∇m · (m × ∂ t m) = −∇m · λ −2 ∆m + κ(m · ν)ν and taking the curl (∇×) we obtain the conservation law [16] (20)…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, J = −∇ x ×x comes about by taking into account (16), and the corresponding term is dropping out by skew-symmetry. In the last step we used ∂ν ∂χ =ê 3 × ν.…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%