1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.117661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ginzburg–Landau theory of Josephson field effect transistors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various models have been proposed to explain the effects of electric fields on grain-boundary transport. Using a Ginzburg-Landau-based model it was shown that the I c changes observed by Dong and collaborators are consistent with a field-induced change in the carrier density in the Josephson junction (Betouras et al, 1996). As the measured I c changes were found to scale with the field-dependent, nonlinear dielectric constant of the gate insulator ⑀ r , it was proposed that the effects were caused by an assumed giant piezoelectric effect of the epitaxial SrTiO 3 gate layer (Petersen, Takeuchi, et al, 1995;Windt et al, 1999; see also Grupp and Goldman, 1997).…”
Section: A Applied Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Various models have been proposed to explain the effects of electric fields on grain-boundary transport. Using a Ginzburg-Landau-based model it was shown that the I c changes observed by Dong and collaborators are consistent with a field-induced change in the carrier density in the Josephson junction (Betouras et al, 1996). As the measured I c changes were found to scale with the field-dependent, nonlinear dielectric constant of the gate insulator ⑀ r , it was proposed that the effects were caused by an assumed giant piezoelectric effect of the epitaxial SrTiO 3 gate layer (Petersen, Takeuchi, et al, 1995;Windt et al, 1999; see also Grupp and Goldman, 1997).…”
Section: A Applied Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Some experiments with such a class of Josephson junctions were conducted in Refs. 4, 5 and 6 with a MFIJJ 11. The modulation of the superconducting order parameter (SCOP) is due to the existence of the magnetic, electric, or combined electric and magnetic field coming from the non‐superconducting element.…”
Section: Definition Of Field‐induced Josephson Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary condition between the s ‐wave superconductor and normal metal is given as where n is the unit vector perpendicular to the superconductor–other medium (as normal metal) interface, b is the constant depending on the material as $b = (N_{s} D_{s} /N_{n} D_{n} )\xi $ , where N s and N n are the densities of states at the Fermi level in a superconductor and in a normal metal at the Fermi level, ξ is the superconducting coherence length, and D s and D f are diffusion constants correlated to the Fermi velocity and relaxation time. The constant b can be expressed by means of the Usadel formalism 9, 11.…”
Section: Mathematical Description Of Fijjmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small area of electrode can minimize the defects of PZT gate and get as high as possible polarization and breakdown field, but for the YBCO channel, the possibility of existence of defects, such as grain boundary where strong field effect can be obtained due to lower carrier density as reported in Ref. 16, should be also minimized in the small gate area especially for the high quality YBCO layer. This may be the reason that we could not get a strong field effect for YBCO channel even under the high polarization and breakdown field of PZT gate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%