Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Management Society (EMIM 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.2991/emim-18.2018.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gingivitis Identification via Grey-level Cooccurrence Matrix and Extreme Learning Machine

Abstract: Abstract. The diagnosis of gingivitis often occurs years later by using a series of conventional oral examination, and they depended a lot on dental records which are physically and mentally laborious task for dentists. In this study, our research presented a new method to diagnose gingivitis, which is based on gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) and extreme learning machine (ELM). The experiments demonstrate that this method is more accurate and sensitive than two state-of-the-art approaches: naï ve Bayes c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the research was able to categorize molars, premolars, canines, and incisors with an accuracy of 79.75% [ 48 ]. Li et al [ 49 ] developed another automated technique for categorizing tooth kinds on dental pictures by utilizing ELM and a gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) [ 50 ]. Experiments indicate that the suggested technique is more sensitive and precise than the naïve Bayes and the wavelet energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the research was able to categorize molars, premolars, canines, and incisors with an accuracy of 79.75% [ 48 ]. Li et al [ 49 ] developed another automated technique for categorizing tooth kinds on dental pictures by utilizing ELM and a gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) [ 50 ]. Experiments indicate that the suggested technique is more sensitive and precise than the naïve Bayes and the wavelet energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%