Gingival shape analysis using surface curvature estimation of the intraoral scans

Abstract

Background Despite many advances in dentistry, no objective and quantitative method is available to evaluate gingival shape. The surface curvature of the optical scans represents an unexploited possibility. The present study aimed to test surface curvature estimation of intraoral scans for objective evaluation of gingival shape. Methods The method consists of four main steps, i.e., optical scanning, surface curvature estimation, region of interest (ROI) definition, and gingival shape analysis. Six different curvature measures and three different diameters were tested for surface curvature estimation on central (n = 78) and interdental ROI (n = 88) of patients with advanced periodontitis to quantify gingiva with a novel gingival shape parameter (GS). The reproducibility was evaluated by repeating the method on two consecutive intraoral scans obtained with a scan-rescan process of the same patient at the same time point (n = 8). Results Minimum and mean curvature measures computed at 2 mm diameter seem optimal GS to quantify shape at central and interdental ROI, respectively. The mean (and standard deviation) of the GS was 0.33 ± 0.07 and 0.19 ± 0.09 for central ROI using minimum, and interdental ROI using mean curvature measure, respectively, computed at a diameter of 2 mm. The method’s reproducibility evaluated on scan-rescan models for the above-mentioned ROI and curvature measures was 0.02 and 0.01, respectively. Conclusions Surface curvature estimation of the intraoral optical scans presents a precise and highly reproducible method for the objective gingival shape quantification enabling the detection of subtle changes. A careful selection of parameters for surface curvature estimation and curvature measures is required.

Evaluation of Dental Root Development Regarding Maxillary Canine Eruption Status after Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

“…Root morphology affects root volume of the tooth so evaluating root morphology could also be beneficial in future studies [30]. In future studies, it could be valuable to analyze the gingival shape of the alveolar cleft with intraoral scans [31]. Intraoral scans were not available for all the patients in our study; however, this could be an interesting future direction.…”

Assessment of the correlation between supracrestal gingival tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypes components via the digital registration method: a cross‑sectional study in a Chinese population

“…Previous studies have demonstrated that digital assessment using CBCT imaging was effective and noninvasive to characterize the phenotypic features of the periodontium compared with clinical methods and histologic assessments [ 22 – 26 ]. In comparison to CBCT, intraoral scanning yield greater precision in capturing soft tissue morphotypes, encompassing aspects such as crown and GM, the curve of the gingival margin, and papilla height (PH) [ 27 , 28 ]. Research has suggested that integrating CBCT images with intraoral scanning data could comprehensively assess the periodontal phenotype of both bone and soft tissue in clinical practice [ 21 , 29 , 30 ].…”