2019
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01046-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GINA 2019: a fundamental change in asthma management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
143
0
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
143
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, they are not included in our definition of rescue medication. Fundamental changes in clinical practice could occur in the near future, as clinical guidelines may be shifting toward recommending maintenance-and-reliever therapeutic schemes in mild to moderate patients at the expense of the traditional "SABA on demand and no maintenance" approach, and render this operational definition obsolete (Reddel et al, 2019). Fourth, despite including many relevant individual variables in our analysis, we may have omitted important variables such as the/an eosinophil count or Asthma Control Test scores as these data are not routinely recorded in linkable clinical databases, though their absence does not affect the relevance of our results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, they are not included in our definition of rescue medication. Fundamental changes in clinical practice could occur in the near future, as clinical guidelines may be shifting toward recommending maintenance-and-reliever therapeutic schemes in mild to moderate patients at the expense of the traditional "SABA on demand and no maintenance" approach, and render this operational definition obsolete (Reddel et al, 2019). Fourth, despite including many relevant individual variables in our analysis, we may have omitted important variables such as the/an eosinophil count or Asthma Control Test scores as these data are not routinely recorded in linkable clinical databases, though their absence does not affect the relevance of our results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…short-term beta-agonists (SABA) as well as short-term muscarinic antagonists (SAMA), followed by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), indicating patients were mainly seeking for advice in case of an exacerbation and potentially SARS-CoV-2 infection. Considering the GINA guidelines in which the authors explicitly state that asthma treatment should no longer be based solely on short-acting bronchodilators, our data clearly indicates a fail in reaching asthma patients with respective fundamental changes in therapy [9].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Based on the result, healthcare professionals should identify pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment that can improve the patients' disease control. According to GINA 2019 (1,26), personalized asthma management implies both assessing, adjusting and reviewing response of treatment. Already in 1999, the Asthma Insights and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study highlighted that asthma is dangerously under-treated in some patients (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%