2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.104403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gilbert-like damping caused by time retardation in atomistic magnetization dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is well-known that even infinitely slow dynamics of M i (t) can pump spin currents [58,59], as well as charge current if additional conditions are satisfied [59][60][61]. Therefore, using NEGF+LLG approach precludes taking into account self-consistent feedback [55,62] where the dynamics of M i (t) leads to pumped spin currents which, in turn, can exert additional torque and timeretarded damping (with microscopically [63,64] rather than phenomenologically [65,66] determined memory kernel) on M i (t) thereby modifying its dynamics. Finally, time-dependent quantum treatment of electrons is required to describe pulse-current-induced dynamics of M i (t) which is of paramount importance in basic research experiments [8] and, e.g., racetrack memory applications [17,18] where usage of current pulses [67] or their trains [68] reduces threshold current density to move the DW while precise control of the DW position can be achieved by tailoring pulse duration and shape [38,[69][70][71][72].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is well-known that even infinitely slow dynamics of M i (t) can pump spin currents [58,59], as well as charge current if additional conditions are satisfied [59][60][61]. Therefore, using NEGF+LLG approach precludes taking into account self-consistent feedback [55,62] where the dynamics of M i (t) leads to pumped spin currents which, in turn, can exert additional torque and timeretarded damping (with microscopically [63,64] rather than phenomenologically [65,66] determined memory kernel) on M i (t) thereby modifying its dynamics. Finally, time-dependent quantum treatment of electrons is required to describe pulse-current-induced dynamics of M i (t) which is of paramount importance in basic research experiments [8] and, e.g., racetrack memory applications [17,18] where usage of current pulses [67] or their trains [68] reduces threshold current density to move the DW while precise control of the DW position can be achieved by tailoring pulse duration and shape [38,[69][70][71][72].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible explanation for this shift of the maximum in Ref. [6] is the influence of high-frequency oscillations imposed on top of the dominant precession, e.g., nutations [23,31,126]. These higher order oscillations emerge in the dynamics for intermediate and strong J sd 4 [14,31], as discussed in Appendix A, and are long-lived [14].…”
Section: A Analysis Of Classical Spin Relaxation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…where B eff , Ĝ and Î is the effective magnetic field, Gilbert damping and the moment of inertia tensor, respectively. The moment of inertia term, Î, has here been added in comparison to the conventional LLG equation, as there has been suggestions of its importance to short-time dynamics [35,62]. The shortcomings of the conventional LLG equation is that its parameters are both constant and local.…”
Section: B Spin Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has successfully been applied to describe the magnetization dynamics of different materials [34]. The LLG equation has been extended to take into account temperature, moment of inertia, and stochastic forces [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Due to the large interest in the field of ultra-fast spin dynamics [43], further investigations has been done of the LLG equation in the ultra-fast regime [36,37] and on dynamic exchange interactions [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%