Gifts, reciprocity and ethically sound ethnographic research: a reflexive framework

Abstract

Purpose Within organizational ethnography, getting access to relevant field sites often requires us to draw on personal and professional networks. Likewise, externally funded research is no longer a rarity. The question is what such financial and social ties mean for our research practices as organizational ethnographers and for our interactions with and descriptions of the field. The purpose of this paper is to address this question and to develop our understanding and practice of organizational ethnography by expanding the methodological literature on research ethics as well as our tools to evaluate research quality. Design/methodology/approach Based on ethnographic fieldwork in a multinational pharmaceutical corporation, and building on previous literature on ethics and quality in qualitative research, this paper introduces a reflexive framework for understanding our personal and financial entanglements in the field and the possible impact of such entanglements on our research findings and representation of informants and events. Findings Drawing on anthropological theory of reciprocity and gift-giving, the paper argues that social and financial entanglements with the field will urge the ethnographer to reciprocate; e.g. by thinking twice about unflattering representations and criticism of those with whom we are entangled. However, the paper further argues that such reflections are an important part of conducting ethically sound ethnographic research. Originality/value Rather than subscribing to an illusion of independent research, this paper demonstrates how we as organizational ethnographers get entangled with the fields that we study and what implications this might have for our practices and representations of these fields.

Cultural practices and organizational ethnography: implications for fieldwork and research ethics

“…As researchers in the field, we interact with different people whom we ask to let us into their worlds and contribute meaningfully to our research. These interactions are situated in local contexts imbued with cultural relations that influence how researchers’ identities are defined (Cox, 2020; Cunliffe and Karunanayake, 2013; Gosovic, 2019). As social actors, we may be adept at navigating such complex social realities, especially if we are socialized within them.…”