2004
DOI: 10.4219/gct-2004-148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gifted Students with Disabilities: Are we Finding Them?

Abstract: Gifted Students With Disabilities Gifted Students With Disabilities A r e We Fin ding Th e m ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the large majority agree that for some children the potential can be diagnosed, and that when this potential evolves according to different characteristics, superiority can be examined in broad categories. Even when the two tests discussed in the study are applied together, it is necessary to evaluate different factors such as product and portfolio files according to current multidimensional superior capability approaches (Karnes, et al, 2004;NAGC-CEC, 2006;Sandall, et al, 2005). However, multidimensional approaches do not reject objective measurement tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the large majority agree that for some children the potential can be diagnosed, and that when this potential evolves according to different characteristics, superiority can be examined in broad categories. Even when the two tests discussed in the study are applied together, it is necessary to evaluate different factors such as product and portfolio files according to current multidimensional superior capability approaches (Karnes, et al, 2004;NAGC-CEC, 2006;Sandall, et al, 2005). However, multidimensional approaches do not reject objective measurement tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended practice guidelines support the use of multiple criteria for the evaluation of superior and early childhood special education (Akarsu, 2001;Karnes, Shaunessy & Bisland, 2004;NAGC-CEC, 2006;Sandall, Hemmeter, Smith, & McLean, 2005). It is particularly defended to use formal and informal evaluations together in the diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the numerous disability categories that may logically coexist with GT are, for example, those that are sensory, communicative (particularly speech related), emotional/behavioral, health and “other‐health” related (including attention‐deficit‐hyperactivity‐disorder), disorders at the mild end of the autism spectrum (e.g., Asperger syndrome), and SLD. Although prevalence data for twice exceptional students are limited (Bianco, 2005), it is estimated that as many as 540,000 such students exist nationwide (Karnes, Shaunessy, & Bisland, 2004), of whom perhaps 95,000 (17.6 percent) have SLD, comprising the largest subgroup of such students (Bianco, 2005). The underidentification of G/LD students (Brody & Mills, 1997; Krochak & Ryan, 2007; Morrison & Rizza, 2007) reflects the challenge in accurately assessing this dual exceptionality, largely owing to the necessity of these students satisfying criteria for two disparate and often mutually exclusive categories (Brody & Mills, 1997; Karnes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Identification Of Twice Exceptional Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers may believe that gifted means globally gifted or highly able across all domains at all times (Karnes, 2004). This belief denies the enormous diversity among gifted students and contributes to the lack of appropriate services for these students.…”
Section: Myths and Misdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%