2017
DOI: 10.1177/0162353217745156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gifted Students’ Conceptions of Their High School STEM Education

Abstract: This qualitative study was conducted to explore gifted students' conceptions of their high school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Participants were seven male and female college freshmen selected from the Honors College of a large research university. In-depth interviews captured students' retrospective accounts of their conceptualizations of their high school STEM education. Interview transcripts were analyzed inductively using a phenomenographic analysis framework. Finding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conducting science in the field with experienced scientists was highly engaging, and using sustainability issues as a context for learning linked to the gifted and talented students' sense of social justice and their need to situate learning within the Bbigger picture^ (Harrison 2004;Merrick and Targett 2004). Furthermore, the students trusted in the quality of information and learning because of their engagement with university scientists and science educators alongside their regular classroom teacher, which is important in establishing positive relationships between teachers and students within gifted education (Hertberg-Davis and Callahan 2008; Mullet et al 2018;Siegle et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conducting science in the field with experienced scientists was highly engaging, and using sustainability issues as a context for learning linked to the gifted and talented students' sense of social justice and their need to situate learning within the Bbigger picture^ (Harrison 2004;Merrick and Targett 2004). Furthermore, the students trusted in the quality of information and learning because of their engagement with university scientists and science educators alongside their regular classroom teacher, which is important in establishing positive relationships between teachers and students within gifted education (Hertberg-Davis and Callahan 2008; Mullet et al 2018;Siegle et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gifted learners are responsive to a degree of autonomy over their own learning, including learning in STEM subjects (Mullet et al 2018). This allows the students a degree of choice and autonomy over the depth and breadth of the content, the learning processes used, and the application of creativity, aligning well with the National Research Council (2002) recommendation of a student-centred approach to teaching STEM.…”
Section: Gifted and Talented Education And Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…y 2018. Los datos indican que el interés y esfuerzo por el estudio del aprendizaje mediado por tecnología en alumnado con AACC ha ido creciendo, así se refleja en el aumento de trabajos publicados y disponibles en la base de datos Scopus fundamentalmente en los últimos 10 años llegando al número máximo de trabajos en 2018 con cinco contribuciones (Lutsik, Sobolev, & Isaev, 2018;Mullet, Kettler, & Sabatini, 2018;Mun & Hertzog, 2018;Tofel-Grehl, Feldon, & Callahan, 2018;Torkar, Avsec, Čepič, Ferk Savec, & Juriševič, 2018), por lo que se apunta a que la tendencia es creciente.…”
Section: Indicadores De Productividadunclassified
“…Ejemplo de estrategias descritas en estos trabajos son: la realidad virtual (Ucar, SUELVES, D.M. et al Ustunel, Civelek, & Umut, 2017), el uso de tecnología móvil (Trumble, Farah, & Slykhuis, 2017), creación de entornos (Shaw & Giles, 2014) y ambientes de aprendizaje (Handa, 2009), aprendizaje autónomo (Jen & Moon, 2015), ABP (Liu, 2004), aprendizaje en línea (Ng & Nicholas, 2007) o la organización de apoyos (Mullet, Kettler, & Sabatini, 2018).…”
Section: Análisis De Contenidounclassified