2010
DOI: 10.1214/09-aop518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gibbsianness and non-Gibbsianness in divide and color models

Abstract: For parameters $p\in[0,1]$ and $q>0$ such that the Fortuin--Kasteleyn (FK) random-cluster measure $\Phi_{p,q}^{\mathbb{Z}^d}$ for $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with parameters $p$ and $q$ is unique, the $q$-divide and color [$\operatorname {DaC}(q)$] model on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ is defined as follows. First, we draw a bond configuration with distribution $\Phi_{p,q}^{\mathbb{Z}^d}$. Then, to each (FK) cluster (i.e., to every vertex in the FK cluster), independently for different FK clusters, we assign a spin value from the set $\… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting sources of non-Gibbsian behavior include time evolutions or deterministic transformations which reduce the complexity of the local state space. A prototypical example of a system of the second type is the fuzzy Potts model (fuzzy PM) [20,28,26,22,19,1]. It is obtained from the ordinary PM by partitioning the local state space {1, 2, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting sources of non-Gibbsian behavior include time evolutions or deterministic transformations which reduce the complexity of the local state space. A prototypical example of a system of the second type is the fuzzy Potts model (fuzzy PM) [20,28,26,22,19,1]. It is obtained from the ordinary PM by partitioning the local state space {1, 2, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since p c (2) = 1 − e −βc , β < β c implies p < p c (2), so that ν p,2 is well-defined, and the FK clusters are all finite with probability one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They both follow the structure of Russo's formulation [30] of Kesten's proof of p c = 1/2 for independent bond percolation on Z 2 , but in both cases, sophisticated methods are required to deal with issues of dependence. Higuchi's proof makes heavy use of the Markovianness of the Ising model for all values of h, but in our model, this property holds only at r = 1/2, and fails for all other values of r (see [2]). Therefore we instead utilise the fact that at r = 1/2 our model coincides with the Ising model, so that we can use a lemma by Higuchi, together with new domination lemmas (presented in Sect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, we only need to look at n = 2 and 3. These are however contained in (A) since (i) it is easier to be injective on a subset (in fact, in this case, RER [2] = RER exch [2] ) and (ii) the examples there showing non-injectivity for n = 3 are in fact exchangeable.…”
Section: Uniqueness Of the Representing Rer In The Finite Casementioning
confidence: 99%